Page 51 - ELT_15th July 2020_Vol 373_Part 2
P. 51

2020 ]                   COURT-ROOM HIGHLIGHTS                       A57

                           “S.L.P. (C) Diary Nos. 4012/2020,  Diary Nos. 4877/2020,  Diary Nos.
                       4878/2020, Diary Nos. 4880/2020, Diary Nos. 4883/2020,  Diary Nos.
                       4884/2020, Diary Nos. 4887/2020, Diary Nos. 4894/2020
                           Delay condoned
                           Having heard Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, we see
                       no reason to interfere with the impugned interim order passed by the High
                       Court, more particularly taking note that certain special leave petitions as-
                       sailing the same impugned order have already been dismissed by  this
                       Court on 17-2-2020. Accordingly, the instant special leave petitions are dis-
                       missed.
                           However, the question of law raised is left open to be considered in an
                       appropriate case.
                           As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory applications, if any,
                       stand disposed of.
                           S.L.P. (C) No. 17307/2019, Diary No. 3417/2020, Diary No. 3424/2020,
                       Diary No. 3437/2020  and Diary No. 3451/2020
                           List these matters after four weeks.
                           In the meantime, Learned  Counsel for the parties are at liberty to
                       bring on record the additional documents, as prayed.”
                       The Madras  High Court  in its  impugned interim order had held that
               pending  final decision on  outcome of  Writ Petition challenging  validity of re-
               strictions placed in para 2.31 of Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 on import of se-
               cond-hand photocopier machines and rejection of petitioner’s application seek-
               ing such authorization, goods imported by petitioners and lying in Customs Port
               be released provisionally on payment of duty. The High Court directed that Cus-
               toms duty has to be paid in Cash on enhanced value as determined by Chartered
               Engineer and that demurrage be waived. The High Court followed its earlier in-
               terim orders issued in bunch of Writ Petitions Nos. 15621 to 15623 of 2018 on
               same matter.
                       REPRESENTED BY :  Mr.  Arijit  Prasad & Mr.  Vikram Choudhary, Senior
                                          Advocates, Mr.  B.  Krishna Prasasd, Mr. B.K.  Prasad,
                                          Mr. Gautam Awasthi,  AORs,  Ms. Nisha Bagchi,
                                          Mr. Prashant Singh,  Mr.  B.K. Satija,  Ms. Shradha
                                          Deshmukh, Mr.  Narender  Kumar Verma  and
                                          Mr.  Harshit Sethi,  Advocates, Mr. Atmaram  N.S.
                                          Nadkarni,  ASG, Ms. Aakanksha  Kaul, Mr.  Harish
                                          Pandey, Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocates, for Gurmeet
                                          Singh Makker, AOR, for the appearing parties.

               Valuation (Customs) — Royalty charge and franchisee fees
                       paid to the foreign supplier whether includible in as-
                       sessable value of the imported goods?
                       The Supreme Court Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M.
               Khanwilkar, Hon’ble  Mr. Justice  Dinesh  Maheshwari and Hon’ble  Mr. Justice
               Sanjiv Khanna on 5-6-2020 after condoning the delay admitted the Civil Appeal
               Diary No. 6538 of 2020 filed by Commissioner of Customs and Excise, Patpar-

                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th July 2020      51
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56