Page 52 - ELT_15th July 2020_Vol 373_Part 2
P. 52

A58                          EXCISE LAW TIMES                   [ Vol. 373

                                     ganj, against the  CESTAT Final  Order  Nos. 50896-50898/2019, dated  16-7-2019
                                     (Quest Retail Private Limited v. Commissioner). While admitting the appeal, the Su-
                                     preme Court passed the following order :
                                                 “Delay condoned.
                                                 Appeal admitted.
                                                 Issue notice on the application for stay, returnable within three weeks.
                                                 Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumara,  Advocate waives notice for the sole
                                            respondent.”
                                            The Appellate Tribunal in its impugned order had held that a perusal of
                                     the agreement between importer and supplier indicate that franchise/royalty fee
                                     has been paid for provisions of management, consultation,  advice service and
                                     training provided to the appellant in connection with use of product. Thus quan-
                                     tum of royalty is based on volume of sale which is a post import activity. Since
                                     payment aforesaid is not connected with import of goods, said charges are not
                                     includible in assessable value. Tribunal relied upon various decisions of Tribunal
                                     and also of Apex Court to say that if there is no nexus of royalty payment with
                                     that of the imported merchandise and which relate to the subsequent marketing
                                     thereof the same is not required to be included for the purpose of payment calcu-
                                     lation of Customs duty on the imported goods, in terms of Customs Act, 1962
                                     and Customs Valuation (Determination of Value Imported Goods) Rules, 2007.
                                            REPRESENTED BY :  Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,  AOR,  Ms.  Vishaka and
                                                                Mr. Anmol Chandan, Advcoates, for the Petitioner.
                                                                Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, AOR and Mr. Aditya
                                                                Bhattacharya, Advocate, for the Respondent.

                                     Demurrage waiver for delay in clearance of import con-
                                            signments at ICDs/CFSs due to lockdown on account
                                            of COVID-19?
                                            The Delhi  High Court Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice  Navin
                                     Chawla on 26-5-2020 issued notice in the W.P. (C) No. 3195 of 2020, C.M. Nos.
                                     11115, 11341, 11346  & 11336 of 2020  filed by Indian Agro and Recycled  Paper
                                     Mills Association against Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.
                                            The High Court tagged the present writ petition with earlier writ peti-
                                     tion 3029 of  2020 titled  M/s. Polytech Trade Foundation v.  Union of  India &  Ors.
                                     wherein an interim order was passed on 22-5-2020 not putting any restraint on
                                     ICD/CFS to collect demurrage charges as per law. The High Court directed that
                                     in terms of aforesaid order Container  Freight Stations (CFSs) and Inland Con-
                                     tainer Depots (ICDs) in minor ports shall be at liberty to demand  such charges as
                                     may be determined by them and petitioners are bound to pay them subject to
                                     outcome of this petition. As far as the CFSs/ICDs in major ports are concerned,
                                     Ss/ICDs were required to follow earlier directions dated 23-4-2020.
                                            REPRESENTED BY :  Mr.  Koshy John, Mr. Manav  Vohra, Mr.  Prateek
                                                                Khanna and Mr. Shantanu Mathur, Advocates, for the
                                                                Petitioner.
                                                                Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG, Mr. Amit Bansal, Senior
                                                                Standing Counsel,  Mr. Vikram S. Nankani, Senior
                                                          EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th July 2020      52
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57