Page 13 - ELT_1st August 2020_Vol 373_Part 3
P. 13

2020 ]                     INDEX -  1st August, 2020                   xi
               CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF ACT, 1985 :
               Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading/Tariff Item
               — 2403 99 10 - See under TOBACCO .........................  423
               — 2403 99 30 - See under TOBACCO .........................  423
               CENVAT/MODVAT/CENVAT CREDIT OF SERVICE TAX :
               — Quantum of - Provisional assessment being also provided under a statute
                  i.e. under Section 18  of Customs  Act, 1962, therefore, payment made
                  under provisionally assessed bills of entry is a deposit and not a duty -
                  Provisionally  assessed bills of entry also valid document for availing
                  Cenvat credit - Consequently, Cenvat credit cannot be denied merely
                  because Cenvat Credit taken on provisionally assessed bills of entry -
                  Even though as per final assessment there was excess payment of CVD
                  which was otherwise not payable, Cenvat credit on the said excess paid
                  CVD cannot be denied - Rules 3 and 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 —
                  Commr. of Central Excise, Bharuch v. Hindalco Industries Ltd. (Tri. - Ahmd.) .........  402
               CENVAT CREDIT RULES, 2004 :
               — Rule 3 - See under CENVAT CREDIT .......................  402
               — Rule 9 - See under CENVAT CREDIT .......................  402
               Chewing Tobacco vis-à-vis Jarda Scented Tobacco, scope of re-classification
                  by department - See under TOBACCO ......................  423
               CHEWING      TOBACCO     AND    UNMANUFACTURED         TOBACCO
                  PACKING     MACHINE     (CAPACITY     DETERMINATION       AND
                  COLLECTION OF DUTY) RULES, 2010 :
               — Rule 6 - See under TOBACCO ...........................  423
               Classification  - Estopple  against re-classification -  Settled in catena of
                  decisions that there is no estopple  in taxation matters and erroneous
                  classification done earlier is not a bar for Department to make correct re-
                  classification subsequently — Dharampal Premchand Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central
                  Excise, Noida (Tri. - All.) .................................  423
               — issue confiscation and penalty not sustainable - See under
                  CONFISCATION AND PENALTY ........................  421
               — of Formulations containing Dextropropoxyphene as Narcotics drug not
                  sustainable - See under MEDICAMENT  .....................  294
               — of Optical fiber Cable - See under OPTICAL FIBER CABLE ...........  421
               Colour TV  Picture Tubes  import, overvaluation to evade ADD not
                  established,  demand not sustainable - See under VALUATION
                  (CUSTOMS) .....................................  415
               Computation of Brand rate of Drawback, element of NCCD required to be
                  factored - See under DRAWBACK  ........................  353
               Conditions of EPCG licence not adhered to resulting in issuance of demand,
                  interest leviable - See under EXIM  ........................  368
               Confiscation and Penalty - Classification issue - Since issue relates to issue
                  of classification of imported Optical Fibre Cables and no facts have been
                  suppressed nor misdeclared while claiming classification, confiscation
                  and penalty not sustainable - Sections 111 and 112 of Customs Act, 1962
                  — Commr. of Cus. (Import), Nhava Sheva v. Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd. (Tri. - Mumbai) ....  421
                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st August 2020      13
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18