Page 16 - ELT_1st August 2020_Vol 373_Part 3
P. 16

xiv                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 373
                                     Customs Broker’s Licence (Contd.)
                                        proceeded against on the basis of stale charges - But to hold that in every
                                        case where revocation proceedings not  initiated within time-limit  in
                                        Regulation 20(1) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013
                                        Customs Broker may get away, too  far-fetched a construction and is
                                        unacceptable - Regulation 20 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations,
                                        2013 does not provide for any consequence, should proceedings be not
                                        initiated within ninety days of receipt of  offence report - In absence  of
                                        consequence  such as one  mentioned  in Section 110(2) of Customs  Act,
                                        1962 time-limit ought to be construed as directory and not mandatory -
                                        Regulation 20 of Customs  Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013  —  Asian
                                        Freight v. Principal Commr. of Cus. (Airport & Administration) (Cal.) ............. 323
                                     — Revocation of - Time-limit for issuing show  cause notice,  whether
                                        directory or mandatory - It is settled by catena of decisions rendered by
                                        Supreme Court, while considering varying statutes,  that when public
                                        functionary is required by statute  to do or perform certain thing or
                                        activity within specified time, same is  ordinarily directory; however, if
                                        consequence  for inaction  on part of statutory authority within such
                                        specified time expressly provided in  statute, it must be held to be
                                        imperative —  Asian Freight  v. Principal Commr. of Cus. (Airport & Administration)
                                        (Cal.)   ......................................... 323
                                     CUSTOMS BROKERS LICENSING REGULATIONS, 2013 :
                                     — Regulation 10 - See under CUSTOMS HOUSE AGENT LICENSE  ....... 317
                                     — Regulation 11(a) - See under CUSTOMS HOUSE AGENT LICENSE ...... 317
                                     — Regulation 13 - See under CUSTOMS BROKER  ................. 380
                                     — Regulation 17(a) - See under CUSTOMS HOUSE AGENT LICENSE ...... 317
                                     — Regulation 18 - See under CUSTOMS HOUSE AGENT LICENSE  ....... 317
                                     — Regulation 19 - See under CUSTOMS BROKER  ................. 323
                                     — Regulation 20(1) - See under CUSTOMS BROKER ................ 323
                                            — See also under CUSTOMS BROKER’S LICENCE  ............ 323
                                     — Regulation 20(7) - See under CUSTOMS BROKER ................ 323
                                     — Regulation 22 - See under CUSTOMS HOUSE AGENT LICENSE  ....... 317
                                     CUSTOMS BROKERS LICENSING REGULATIONS, 2018 :
                                     — Regulation 2(h) - See under CUSTOMS BROKER  ................ 380
                                     CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE DUTIES AND SERVICE TAX
                                        DRAWBACK RULES, 1995 :
                                     — See under DRAWBACK ............................... 353
                                     Customs House Agent Licence  - Revocation and forfeiture of security
                                        deposit - Fraudulent exports - Show cause notice alleging license sublet
                                        to Shri Uma Mahesh, Managing Partner of V.D. Logistics for ` 25,000 per
                                        month  and violation of  conditions of Customs Brokers Licensing
                                        Regulations, 2013 for non-verification  of antecedent  and existence of
                                        exporters - Assessee claiming statement obtained from Shri Uma Mahesh
                                        under duress and shipping bills on two importers filed by them after
                                        verifying IEC with JDGFT, addresses of parties and CST number - When
                                        statement retracted by Shri Uma Mahesh alleging that statement taken
                                                         EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st August 2020      16
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21