Page 140 - ELT_1st September 2020_Vol 373_Part 5
P. 140

578                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 373

                                                        2020 (373) E.L.T. 578 (S.C.)
                                                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                                      A.M. Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.
                                                COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS)
                                                                      Versus
                                                  DEEP JYOTI WAX TRADERS PVT. LTD.
                                                Civil Appeal Nos. 202-209 of 2019, decided on 12-4-2019
                                                                                                 1
                                            Order of CESTAT - Natural justice violation - Very sketchy and cryptic
                                     order of CESTAT, Kolkata not dealing with every aspect of that ought to be
                                     gone into in deciding the statutory appeal both on facts and on law - CESTAT
                                     order set aside and case remand to CESTAT - Section 130E of Customs Act,
                                     1962. [paras 6, 7]
                                                                                             Matter remanded
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      S/Shri Tushar Mehta, SG, B. Krishna Prasad, AOR,
                                                                  Zoheb Hossain, Ms.  Akansha Kaul, Rupesh Kumar
                                                                  and Chiranjeev Chauhan, Advocates, for the Appel-
                                                                  lant.
                                                                  Ms. Pratibha Jain, AOR, S/Shri Puneet Jain, Sudhir
                                                                  Mehta, Ms. Christi Jain, Harsh Jain, Abhinav Gupta
                                                                  and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates, for the Respond-
                                                                  ent.
                                            [Order]. - Delay condoned.
                                            2. Appeal Admitted.
                                            3.  Heard Learned Counsel for the parties.
                                            4.  These appeals take exception to the judgment and order dated 3-5-
                                     2018 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Re-
                                     gional Bench, Kolkata in MA Em Nos. 75388-75395 of 2018 & Cus. Appeal Nos.
                                     75687-75694 of 2018 [2019 (366) E.L.T. 862 (Tribunal)].
                                            5.  For the nature of order that we propose to pass, it is unnecessary to
                                     dilate on the factual matrix of the case.
                                            6.  Suffice it to observe that the impugned judgment, in our opinion, is
                                     very sketchy and cryptic. It does not deal with every aspect that ought to be gone
                                     into in deciding the statutory appeal both on facts and on law. We refrain from
                                     examining the contentions available to the parties on merits and instead relegate
                                     the parties before the Appellate Authority for reconsideration  of the appeal
                                     afresh on its own merits and in accordance with law.
                                            7.  The impugned judgment and order is set aside. The parties are rele-
                                     gated before the Appellate Authority for the reconsideration of the appeal afresh.
                                            8.  The Civil Appeals are allowed in the above terms.
                                            9.  Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

                                                                     ________
                                     ________________________________________________________________________
                                     1  On appeal from 2019 (366) E.L.T. 862 (Tribunal).
                                                        EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st September 2020      140
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145