Page 224 - ELT_1st September 2020_Vol 373_Part 5
P. 224

662                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 373

                                                        2020 (373) E.L.T. 662 (Kar.)
                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                                                  Aravind Kumar and Hemant Chandangoudar, JJ.
                                                          STATE OF KARNATAKA
                                                                      Versus
                                               DREDGING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.
                                               Civil Revision Petition No. 248 of 2011, decided on 4-3-2020
                                                                                                  1
                                            Dredger - Ocean going vessels/ship or machinery - On taking into con-
                                     sideration common parlance definition  and definition of ship as defined in
                                     Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, dredges to be construed as ship - Dredges regis-
                                     tered as a ship under said Act recognized by Income Tax Department as a ship
                                     - Statutory authorities under different enactments have consistently held that
                                     ‘dredger’  are to  be considered  as  “ocean going vessels”  - Dredges are  ocean
                                     going vessels i.e., ship and not machinery - Entry 52 of 1st Schedule to Karna-
                                     taka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979. [paras 7, 8]
                                                                                            Petition dismissed
                                                                  CASES CITED
                                     Atul Glass Industries Ltd. v. Collector — 1986 (25) E.L.T. 473 (S.C.) — Relied on ........................... [Para 7]
                                     Collector v. Dredging Corporation — 1991 (55) E.L.T. A33 (S.C.) — Relied on ............................... [Para 7]
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      Shri Vikram Huilgol, HCGP, for the Petitioner.
                                                                  S/Shri  G. Rabhinathan and  N. Thirumalesh,  Advo-
                                                                  cates, for the Respondent.
                                            [Order per : Aravind Kumar, J.]. - This revision petition came to be ad-
                                     mitted on 7-6-2012 to consider the following substantial questions of law :
                                            (i)  Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Karnataka
                                                 Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the dredgers are
                                                 ocean going vessels i.e., ships and it cannot be called as machinery?
                                            (ii)  Whether in the facts  and circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble
                                                 Karnataka Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the
                                                 dredgers is a ship or vessel based on the registration under the Mer-
                                                 chant Shipping Act, 1958 and also described under Chapter 89 of
                                                 the Central Excise Act?
                                            2.  The respondent herein is a Government of India undertaking consti-
                                     tuted for providing services at all sea ports in India to carry out dredging opera-
                                     tions for removal of sand, silt and other debris accumulated at the sea bed so as
                                     to facilitate unimpeded and unhampered ingress and egress of ships into and out
                                     of the ports. Respondent owns dredgers and deploys the same at the ports to car-
                                     ry out dredging operations. The Assessing Authority under Section 5(4) of the
                                     Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 (for short ‘KTEG Act’) levied entry
                                     tax of Rs. 1,06,00,000/- @ 2% on dredges by construing the same as machinery
                                     and similar penalty under Section 5(5) of the KTEG Act, which was rectified un-
                                     der Section  17(1) of the KTEG Act on 29-6-2006 determining the tax  at
                                     Rs. 22,91,164/- and also levied same amount of penalty for the assessment year
                                     ________________________________________________________________________
                                     1    On appeal from STA No. 379/2009, dated 30-6-2010 by Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Banga-
                                         lore.
                                                        EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st September 2020      224
   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229