Page 82 - GSTL_26th March 2020_Vol 34_Part 4
P. 82

592                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 34
                                     insertion. It should thus, in my view, be read as clarificatory and operative retro-
                                     spectively.
                                            16.  Learned Counsel for the petitioners also draw my attention to the
                                     decision of the Telengana High Court in the case of Megha Engineering and Infra-
                                     structures Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Central Tax and Others [2019-TIOL-893 = 2019
                                     (26) G.S.T.L. 183 (Telangana)], where the Division Bench interprets Section 50 as
                                     canvassed by the Revenue. The amendment brought to Section 50(1), was only at
                                     the stage of press release by the Ministry of Finance at the time when the Divi-
                                     sion Bench passed its order and the Division Bench thus states that ‘unfortunately,
                                     the recommendations of the GST Council are still on paper. Therefore, we cannot inter-
                                     pret  Section  50 in  the light of the proposed amendment’. Today, however, the
                                     amendment stands incorporated into the Statute and comes to the aid of the as-
                                     sessee.
                                            17.  In the light of the above discussion, these Writ Petitions are allowed
                                     and the impugned notices are set aside. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Peti-
                                     tions are closed.
                                                                     _______
                                                      2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 592 (P & H)

                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
                                                      Jaswant Singh and Girish Agnihotri, JJ.
                                                       BINDAL SMELTING PVT. LTD.
                                                                      Versus
                                                                       ADDL. DIR. GEN., DIRECTORATE GEN. OF GST
                                             ADDL. DIR. GEN., DIRECTORATE GEN. OF GST
                                                                INTELLIGENCE
                                                                       ADDL. DIR. GEN., DIRECTORATE GEN. OF GST
                                                C.W.P. No. 31382 of 2019 (O&M), decided on 20-12-2019
                                            Attachment  of Bank Account - Power for provisional attachment of
                                     bank account - It is not absolute - Expression “is of opinion” or “has reason to
                                     believe”  indicates that subjective satisfaction of  Commissioner depends  on
                                     facts and circumstances of each case - “Opinion” must have rational connec-
                                     tion with or relevant bearing on formation of opinion - Rational connection
                                     requires direct nexus/live link  between protection of interest  and  available
                                     property which might not be available at time of recovery of taxes after final
                                     adjudication of dispute - “Opinion” must be formed in good faith and not be
                                     mere  pretence - Courts  can  determine whether  formation of opinion is arbi-
                                     trary, capricious or whimsical - “Necessary” requires that order and record in-
                                     dicating that it was necessary to take drastic action of attachment - Section 83
                                     of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. [para 7]
                                            Attachment of Bank Account - Power of provisional attachment - It is
                                     drastic and far-reaching power that must be used sparingly and only on sub-
                                     stantive weighty grounds and reasons - It should be exercised only to protect
                                     interest of revenue and not to ruin business of any taxable person - Section 83
                                     of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. [para 10]
                                            Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 83 - Scope of - Pri-
                                     marily it permits attachment of property - Property means asset which may be
                                     movable, immovable, tangible, intangible or  in form of some  instrument -
                                     Cash in hand as well as bank account is property, in form of liquidity which is
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      26th March 2020      178
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87