Page 43 - GSTL_23rd April 2020_Vol 35_Part 4
P. 43

2020 (35) G.S.T.L. 369 (Guj.)
                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                                J.B. Pardiwala and Bhargav D. Karia, JJ.
                               REAL PRINCE SPINTEX PVT. LTD.

                                                Versus
                                         UNION OF INDIA
                       R/Special Civil Application No. 14974 of 2019, decided on 4-3-2020
                       Refund of IGST - Zero-rated supply - Drawback availing in excess -
               Undisputedly, petitioner has exported goods on  payment of  IGST and said
               supply therefore is zero-rated supply under IGST Act and eligible, per se, for
               refund - Application for refund has also been filed within time as stipulated
               under Section 54 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Denial of re-
               fund not sustainable - Refund of IGST paid with regard to the exported goods,
               i.e., “zero-rated supplies” directed to be sanctioned  immediately, with  7%
               simple interest from the date of shipping bill till the date of actual refund -
               However, refund shall be granted after deducting the differential amount of
               the duty drawback for the period between July and September, 2017 - Sections
               16 and 54 of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Article 226 of Con-
               stitution of India. [paras 8, 10]
                                                                        Petition allowed
                                             CASE CITED
               Amit Cotton Industries v. Principal Commissioner
                    — 2019 (29) G.S.T.L. 200 (Guj.) — Relied on ................................................................... [Paras 5, 6, 7, 8]
                       REPRESENTED BY :     Shri Uchit N. Sheth, for the Petitioner.
                                            Shri Nirzar S. Desai, for the Respondent.
                       [Judgment per : J.B. Pardiwala, J. (Oral)]. - Rule, returnable forthwith.
               Mr. Nirzar S. Desai, the Learned Standing Counsel waives service of notice of
               rule for and on behalf of the respondents.
                       2.  By this  Writ Application under Article  226  of  the Constitution of
               India, the writ-applicants have prayed for the following reliefs :
                       “(A) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a
                           writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order
                           directing the Learned Respondents  to forthwith grant refund  of
                           IGST paid on exports by the Petitioner after deducting the differen-
                                     GST LAW TIMES      23rd April 2020      163
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48