Page 192 - GSTL_30th April 2020_Vol 35_Part 5
P. 192

662                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 35
                                     Demand (Contd.)
                                        Entire issue of non-transfer of land to JV company, taken by Government
                                        of India and by State of Rajasthan, subsequent to acquisition of land, to
                                        be considered only as change of  opinion in subsequent periods -
                                        Therefore, no case of suppression of facts, so as to invoke larger period of
                                        limitation, made out - Also, intent  to evade payment of duty, which is
                                        sine qua non for invoking proviso  under Section 73A of Finance Act,
                                        1994, not apparent from record - Demand time-barred - Section 73A of
                                        Finance Act, 1994 — Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd. v. Commr. of C. Ex. & S.T.,
                                        Jaipur (Tri. - Del.) .................................... 561
                                     — Limitation - Liability for past work - It could not be fastened on assessee
                                        only for reason that in present or future assessee started paying Service
                                        Tax under compulsion by principal - There was no contumacious
                                        conduct, suppression or falsification of records by assessee - Also, Service
                                        Tax paid by assessee was available to principal as Cenvat credit - Hence,
                                        extended period was not invocable - Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994 —
                                        Aditya Enterprises v. Commissioner of Cus. & C. Ex., Meerut-II (Tri. - Del.) .......... 406
                                     — of Service Tax not sustainable on reimbursed expenses - See under COST
                                        REIMBURSEMENT ................................. 202
                                     — Renting of Immovable Property Service - Royalty charges collected from
                                        caterers operating  in club  premises, taxability of -  HELD :  Caterer
                                        allowed to  roam around in entire premises of Club to offer food  and
                                        catering services - Club not providing any other service either in form of
                                        cutlery crockery or in form of serving boys - Assessee providing Renting
                                        of Immovable Property Service - Even though facts  of Royal Western
                                        India Turf Club Ltd. [2015 (38) S.T.R. 811 (Tribunal)] similar but proposal
                                        in show cause notice for Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. altogether
                                        different, hence, adjudication not  completely binding - Demand  qua
                                        receiving charges from caterers to roam in club premises as consideration
                                        for providing Renting of Immovable Property Service rightly confirmed -
                                        Section 65(90a) of Finance Act, 1994 — Hyderabad Race Club v. Commissioner of
                                        Cus. & C. Ex., Hyderabad (Tri. - Hyd.) ........................... 289
                                     Deployment of officers in JV company, demand under BAS not sustainable
                                        - See under DEMAND  ............................... 561
                                     Destination - Refund of  GST with interest collected  again on release of
                                        already tax paid goods detained for vehicle found at wrong destination -
                                        See under DETENTION  .............................. 257
                                     Detective services availed for finding manufacturers of spurious products,
                                        Cenvat credit admissible - See under CENVAT CREDIT  ............ 405
                                     — Input service credit admissible on Detective services availed for finding
                                        manufacturers of spurious products - See under CENVAT CREDIT ...... 405
                                     Detention of goods and vehicle in transit - Inter-State Trade - CGST/SGST
                                        paid instead of IGST - Release of goods and vehicles on simple Bond -
                                        Undisputedly said goods were accompanied with a valid E-way Bill and
                                        tax paid invoice - Although invoice is showing inadvertent payment of
                                        CGST/SGST instead of IGST, E-way Bill is  correctly showing
                                        involvement   of   IGST   -   Therefore,   petitioner’s    pleading    that   this

                                                          GST LAW TIMES      30th April 2020      192
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197