Page 196 - GSTL_30th April 2020_Vol 35_Part 5
P. 196

666                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 35
                                     Exemption (Contd.)
                                     — Change in law - Migration to GST - Doctrine of promissory estoppel - Plea
                                        of promissory estoppel cannot be enforced against an act done in
                                        accordance with statutory provisions of law -  Express provision  in
                                        Section 174(2)(c) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 providing
                                        that any tax exemption granted as an incentive against investment
                                        through  notification under erstwhile Central Excise Act, 1944 not to
                                        continue as privilege if notification rescinded - Notification No. 50/2003-
                                        C.E. granting 100% exemption rescinded - Absence of challenge to
                                        recission of notification or  vires  of Section 174 of Central Goods and
                                        Services Tax Act, 2017 - Pleas of promissory estoppel not maintainable —
                                        Hero Motocorp. Ltd. v. Union of India (Del.) ........................  99
                                     — from GST on Manpower services received as pure  services - See  under
                                        PURE SERVICES  .................................. 225
                                     — from payment of Customs duty under EPCG Scheme, scope of - See under
                                        EXPORT PROMOTION CAPITAL GOODS (EPCG) SCHEME  ......... 261
                                     — from service tax under Notification No. 18/2002-S.T., dated 16-12-2002 to
                                        extent of R & D cess, scope of - See under CESS  ................. 123
                                     — not admissible to purified water supplied in empty unsealed cans - See
                                        under WATER .................................... 450
                                     —  Onus  of  proof - Well-settled position of law that person claiming
                                        exemption needs to prove that he satisfies all conditions of Notification
                                        so as to be eligible to benefit of the same — Inox Wind Ltd. v. Commissioner of
                                        Service Tax, Noida (Tri. - All.) ............................... 123
                                     — to pure services of collection of amounts towards LAD fund - See under
                                        PURE SERVICE  ................................... 478
                                     — under Area Based Exemption scheme not admissible on migration to GST
                                        - See under AREA BASED EXEMPTION  .....................  99
                                     —  Under-construction  building sale is supply of service, exemption
                                        admissible - See under BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT  ......... 510
                                     — under GST not admissible on supply of frozen chicken in unit packing -
                                        See under FOOD FROZEN CHICKEN  ...................... 312
                                     — under Notification No. 24/2004-S.T. not admissible to Computer Training
                                        Institute providing Commercial Training or  Coaching services - See
                                        under COMMERCIAL TRAINING OR COACHING SERVICES ........ 304
                                     Exemption   Notifications,  scope  of  interpretation  -  See  under
                                        INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES ........................ 123
                                     Export made through intermediary (canalized agency), refund of Service Tax
                                        admissible to actual exporter - See under REFUND/REFUND CLAIM  .... 208
                                     — of goods  on payment  of IGST with excess drawback claimed, refund
                                        allowed   after  deducting  excess  drawback   -   See   under
                                        REFUND/REFUND CLAIM ............................ 369
                                     —  of output  services in pre-GST regime, refund of Cenvat credit of input
                                        services admissible in post-GST regime - See under REFUND/REFUND
                                        CLAIM ........................................ 297
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      30th April 2020      196
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201