Page 57 - GSTL_7th May 2020_Vol 36_Part 1
P. 57

2020 ]        IREO HOSPITALITY COMPANY PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA    15
               The above extracts demonstrate the medical use of Nitrous Oxide as a general
               anesthetic as well as in operation rooms for its analgesic and anxiolytic proper-
               ties.
                       31.  In the proceedings before this Court, it was not seriously disputed
               that Medical  Oxygen IP and Nitrous  Oxide IP sub-serve a medicinal purpose.
               There is no doubt that Medical Oxygen IP and Nitrous Oxide IP are medicines
               used for or in the diagnosis, treatment, mitigation or prevention of any disease or
               disorder in human beings falling within the ambit of Section 3(b)(i) of the 1940
               Act. We hold that Medical Oxygen IP and Nitrous Oxide IP fall within the ambit
               of Section 3(b)(i) of the 1940 Act and are consequently covered in Entry 88 of the
               2005 Act.
                       32.  The impugned judgment of the High Court, to the extent it held
               that Medical Oxygen IP and Nitrous Oxide IP fall within Entry 88 of the 2005 Act
               is upheld.
                       33.  The appeals are  dismissed, although for  the reasons  highlighted
               above. There shall be no order as to costs.
                       34.  Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

                                                _______

                                 2020 (36) G.S.T.L. 15 (P & H)
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
                               Dr. S. Muralidhar and Avneesh Jhingan, JJ.
                           IREO HOSPITALITY COMPANY PVT. LTD.

                                                Versus
                                         UNION OF INDIA
                   C.W.P. Nos. 4144, 4506, 4507, 4512 & 4513 of 2020, decided on 18-3-2020
                       Attachment - Provisional  attachment of bank accounts - GST - Rea-
               soned order - Reasons as to whether provisional attachment of bank accounts
               effected to safeguard Revenue’s interest required to be recorded to enable af-
               fected person to file objections - Order of provisional attachment of Petition-
               ers’ bank accounts set aside - Fresh orders to be passed by Respondent No. 2
               taking into account the submissions made by Petitioners, not later than 10th
               April, 2020 - Petitioners to ensure that no payments other than those set out in
               the tabular form for “essential business payments” would be made from the
               accounts till passing of fresh orders and that further receipts in the accounts
               till date of passing of fresh orders will remain untouched - Section 83 of Cen-
               tral Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 159 of Central Goods and
               Services Tax Rules, 2017. [paras 6, 14, 15]
                                                                     Petition disposed of
                       REPRESENTED BY :     S/Shri Balbir Singh, Senior Advocate with Gajendra
                                            Maheshwari, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
                                            S/Shri Sourabh Goel, Senior Panel Counsel and
                                            Ms.  Amrita  Garg, Advocate for Arjun Sheoran,
                                            Advocate, for the Respondent.
                                     GST LAW TIMES      7th May 2020      57
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62