Page 158 - GSTL_14th May 2020_Vol 36_Part 2
P. 158

260                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 36
                                            (ii)  The appointment of auditors for  NDDB would be subject to  ap-
                                                 proval of Central Government. [Section 28]
                                            (iii)  The Audit Report issued by the auditors would be laid before the
                                                 Parliament by the Central Government. [Section 29]
                                            (iv)  In case NDDB wishes to form new company or acquire any compa-
                                                 ny then the previous approval of Central Government is mandato-
                                                 ry. Central Government may make any scheme and liquidation can
                                                 be done by order of the Central Government. [Section 37]
                                     In view of  the above, the appellant  has submitted that it is fully gov-
                                     erned/controlled by the Central Government and hence it fulfills the condition
                                     of ninety per cent. or more participation by way of control in order to qualify as
                                     Governmental Authority.
                                            9.  Personal Hearing in this case was held on 14-6-2019, wherein in ad-
                                     dition to reiterating their submission in the appeal memorandum, they submit-
                                     ted Notification S.O. 1869(E), dated 9-6-2017 and Notification S.O. 1140(E), dated
                                     6-3-2019 to buttress the point that their organization has been set up under the
                                     Act of Parliament and is fully controlled by Central Government.
                                     Findings (as per Ajay Jain) :
                                            10.  We have considered the submissions made by the appellant in the
                                     appeal as well as at the time of personal hearing.
                                            11.  The main issue involved in this case is whether the exemption pro-
                                     vided vide Sr. 4 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) is admissible to
                                     appellant for providing  service of ‘Renting of Immovable Property’ to ‘Anan-
                                     dalaya Educational Society’. The said Sr. 4 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central
                                     Tax (Rate) reads as follows :-
                                                                      TABLE

                                             Sl.  Chapter, Section,   Description of Services   Rate  Con-
                                             No.  Heading, Group                             (per  dition
                                                  or Service Code                           cent.)
                                                     (Tariff)
                                             (1)       (2)                   (3)              (4)  (5)
                                              4     Chapter 99   Services by [*  *  *] governmen-  Nil  Nil
                                                                tal authority by way of any activi-
                                                                ty in relation to any function en-
                                                                trusted to a  municipality under
                                                                article 243W of the Constitution.

                                            12.1  As the aforesaid  Sr. 4 of  Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax
                                     (Rate) provides exemption to specified services by ‘Governmental authority’, the
                                     appellant has raised a question whether it would be qualified as ‘Governmental
                                     Authority’ from GST perspective. The term ‘Governmental Authority’ has been
                                     defined at clause (zf) of Para 2 of the said Notification as follows :-
                                            “(zf)  “Governmental Authority” means  an authority or a board or any
                                            other body, -
                                                  (i)   set up by an Act of Parliament or a State Legislature; or
                                                  (ii)  established by any Government,



                                                          GST LAW TIMES      14th May 2020      158
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163