Page 76 - GSTL_14th May 2020_Vol 36_Part 2
P. 76

178                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 36
                                                 Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat v. Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals (supra)
                                                 it appears that the liability to pay interest on interest by the Revenue
                                                 is not approved and to that extent the contention of the Revenue can
                                                 be maintained. But the further contention of the Revenue that no in-
                                                 terest whatsoever would be payable if the refund of the amount of tax
                                                 or refund of the amount deposited towards tax is to be made, no in-
                                                 terest whatsoever would be available by way of compensatory meas-
                                                 ure.
                                                 17.  In our view, the general principles for awarding compensation
                                                 to the Assessee for the delay in receiving monies properly due to it is
                                                 not disapproved by the Larger Bench of the Apex Court in the case of
                                                 Commissioner of Income  Tax,  Gujarat  v. Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals  (su-
                                                 pra).”
                                                 13.  In our view, the above-referred observation made by this Court
                                                 in the above-referred decision in case of Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals (su-
                                                 pra) is a complete answer to the contention of the Learned A.G.P. that
                                                 the interest can be awarded even if not expressly barred by the statute or that
                                                 the taxing statute is silent about the same”.
                                            20.  The word ‘Compensation’ has been  defined  in  P. Ramanatha Aiyar’s
                                            Advanced Law Lexicon 3rd Edition 2005 page 918 as follows :
                                                 “An act which a Court orders to be done, or money which a Court
                                                 orders to be paid, by a person whose acts or omissions have caused
                                                 loss or injury to another in order that thereby the person damnified
                                                 may receive equal value for his loss, or be made whole in respect of
                                                 his injury; the consideration or price of a privilege purchased; some-
                                                 thing given or obtained as an equivalent; the rendering of an equiva-
                                                 lent in value or amount; an equivalent given for property taken or for
                                                 an injury done to another; the giving back an equivalent in either
                                                 money which is but the measure of value, or in actual value other-
                                                 wise conferred; a recompense in  value; a  recompense given for a
                                                 thing received recompense for the whole injury suffered; remunera-
                                                 tion or satisfaction for injury or damage of every description; remu-
                                                 neration for loss of time, necessary expenditures, and for permanent
                                                 disability if such be the result; remuneration for the injury directly
                                                 and proximately caused by a breach of contract or duty; remunera-
                                                 tion or wages given to an employee or officer.”
                                            21.  We may now reproduce the Chart indicating the delay in days :-
                                                      Delay in refund for SARAF NATURAL STONE

                                                 Month   Invoice   Refund   Date of   7 days   Date of  Delay
                                                          Date    Amount  filing of   from   Refund   in
                                                                           GSTR3   Return           days
                                                                                    Filing
                                                 July, 17  6-7-2017  12018  25-8-2017   1-9-17  18-6-2018  290
                                                         10-7-2017   16380                 25-4-2018  236
                                                         10-7-2017   12763                 25-4-2018  236
                                                         11-7-2017  2,33,103               4-12-2017  94
                                                         12-7-2017  2,77,949               4-12-2017  94
                                                         13-7-2017   9183                  25-4-2018  236
                                                         13-7-2017  2,17,718               4-12-2017  94
                                                         13-7-2017   12534                 25-4-2018  236
                                                           GST LAW TIMES      14th May 2020      76
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81