Page 115 - GSTL_11th June 2020_Vol 37_Part 2
P. 115

2020 ]  SGS CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. v. COMMR. OF S.T., NEW DELHI 201
                       26.  The following conditions have to be satisfied pre-negative list for a
               service to qualify as a GTA service :
                       (i)   There should be an activity in relation to transport of goods
                            by road;
                       (ii)   Issuance of consignment note by the GTA;
                       (iii)   Activity is performed by a GTA for another; and
                       (iv)   Activity is performed for consideration.
                       27.  It cannot be doubted that the  first condition  with regard  to both
               pre-negative list and the post-negative list is satisfied since RMC has been trans-
               ported by the appellant using transit mixers of the appellant by road. The second
               condition relating to issuance of consignment note by GTA in the pre-negative
               list period and the post-negative list period is also satisfied as the appellant had
               issued the consignment notes. The third condition in the post-negative list period
               is that the activity should be performed by the GTA for  another. It cannot be
               doubted that the appellant has undertaken the transportation of RMC for the
               mine owners. The fourth condition of the post-negative period is that the activity
               should performed for a consideration. It cannot also be doubted that the appel-
               lant is receiving consideration from the service recipient as is clear from the in-
               voices raised by the appellant to the service recipient.
                       28.  Thus, the appellant has been rendering GTA service by transporting
               RMC from one place to another as per the directions of the service recipient. The
               finding to the contrary recorded in the impugned  order by the Commissioner
               that the appellant was not performing GTA service but was performing STG ser-
               vice cannot be sustained.
                       29.  It is, therefore, not necessary to examine the other contentions
               raised by the Learned Counsel for the appellant.  The impugned order dated
               15 January, 2016 is accordingly, set aside and the appeal is allowed.
                                    (Order dictated in the open Court)

                                                _______

                              2020 (37) G.S.T.L. 201 (Tri. - Del.)
                          IN THE CESTAT, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
                                            [COURT NO. II]

                    S/Shri Anil Choudhary, Member (J) and Bijay Kumar, Member (T)
                      SGS CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
                                                Versus
                                  COMMR. OF S.T., NEW DELHI
                     Final Order No. ST/A/51255/2019-CU(DB), dated 15-1-2019 in Appeal
                                       No. ST/53612/2014-CU(DB)
                       Turnover - Total turnover - Meaning of - “Turnover” being not defined
               in Notification No. 25/2012-S.T. or in the Finance Act, 1994, in order to inter-
               pret the meaning  thereof, in Serial  No.  6  of Notification No. 25/2012-S.T.,
               common parlance meaning as understood by those dealing  in accounts and
                                    GST LAW TIMES      11th June 2020      115
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120