Page 145 - GSTL_11th June 2020_Vol 37_Part 2
P. 145

2020 ]   LUDHIANA BUILDERS v. COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. AND S.T., LUDHIANA  231
               fiable under Works Contract service - Section 77 of Finance Act, 1994. [paras 3,
               4]
                                                                       Appeal dismissed
                       REPRESENTED BY :     Shri G.M. Sharma,  Authorised Representative, for
                                            the Appellant.
                                            None, for the Respondent.
                       [Order per : Ashok Jindal, Member  (J)]. -  The  Revenue is in appeal
               against the impugned order for not imposing the penalty under Section 77 of the
               Finance Act, 1994 as the respondent has not registered themselves under the cat-
               egory of ‘Construction of Complex (Residential) Services’ during the impugned
               period.
                       2.  Heard the Ld. AR
                       3.  We find that as per the record placed before us, the respondent was
               not registered with the department under the category of ‘Construction of Com-
               plex (Residential) Services’ and was providing that service along with material;
               therefore, the issue arises before us is that -
                       Whether the respondent was required to register themselves under the
                       category of ‘Construction of Complex (Residential) Services’ or not?
                       4.  Admittedly the service provided by the respondent is merit classifi-
               cation under ‘Works Contract’. In that circumstance, the respondent was not re-
               quired to register themselves under the category of ‘Construction of Complex
               (Residential) Services’, therefore, the question of imposing the penalty under Sec-
               tion 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 does not arise.
                       5.  In the above terms, we do not find any merits in the appeal filed by
               the Revenue, accordingly, the same is dismissed.
                               (Dictated and pronounced in the open Court)

                                                _______

                             2020 (37) G.S.T.L. 231 (Tri. - Chan.)

                         IN THE CESTAT, REGIONAL BENCH, CHANDIGARH
                                            [COURT NO. I]
                         S/Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (J) and Raju, Member (T)
                                      LUDHIANA BUILDERS
                                                Versus
                      COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. AND S.T., LUDHIANA

                      Final Order No. A/60881/2019-CU(DB), dated 22-10-2019 in Appeal
                                             No. ST/3/2010
                       Construction of Residential Complex service  - Construction  of flats
               using own materials not taxable under category of Construction of Residential
               Complex service or under Works Contract service prior to 1-6-2007 - Such ser-
               vices taxable as Works Contract service only w.e.f. 1-6-2007 - However, Service

                                    GST LAW TIMES      11th June 2020      145
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150