Page 147 - GSTL_11th June 2020_Vol 37_Part 2
P. 147

2020 ]    SANTOSH PRADHAN v. COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & S.T., BHAVNAGAR  233
                           structing residential complexes along with material and the same is
                           having merit classification under the category of ‘Works Contract
                           Service’ as held by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s. Lar-
                           son & Toubro Limited (supra). We find that it has been held that for
                           the period prior to  1-6-2007, no demand can be raised under that
                           category and thereafter the demand  is to be confirmed under
                           ‘Works Contract Service’. Admittedly, the show cause notice does
                           not propose the levy of service tax under the ‘Works Contract Ser-
                           vice’, therefore, we hold that the appellant is not liable to pay ser-
                           vice tax under the category of ‘Construction of Residential Complex
                           Services’. In these terms, we set aside the demand of Rs. 29,15,465/-.
                       (b)  Site Formation Services :- We have gone the records placed before
                           us and as per the records, the appellant is constructing a road. As
                           per the impugned order itself, the only reason to denial benefit was
                           that the roads were not open to general public and thus not covered
                           under public utility. We  find that Notification  No. 17/2005-S.T.,
                           dated 7-6-2005 does not say that if it is not a public road then it is li-
                           able to be taxed. Therefore, we hold that the appellant is engaged in
                           the construction of road and the same is exempt as per the Notifica-
                           tion No. 17/2005-S.T., dated 7-6-2005,  therefore, no service tax is
                           payable by the appellant.
                       8.  In view of the above discussion, we dropped the demand confirmed
               against the appellant and set aside the impugned order.
                       9.  In result, the appellant is allowed with consequential relief, if any.
                            (Operative part of the order pronounced in the Court)

                                                _______

                             2020 (37) G.S.T.L. 233 (Tri. - Ahmd.)
                        IN THE CESTAT, WEST ZONAL BENCH, AHMEDABAD
                                           [COURT NO. III]
                         S/Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (J) and Raju, Member (T)
                                      SANTOSH PRADHAN

                                                Versus
                       COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & S.T., BHAVNAGAR
                     Final Order Nos. A/11908-11911/2019-WZB/AHD, dated 15-10-2019
                                    in Appeal Nos. ST/417-420/2010-DB
                       Manpower Recruitment or  Supply Agency service - Taxability after
               16-6-2005 when same provided by an individual or proprietorship concern - As
               per amended definition of Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency service
               with effect from aforesaid date, such services taxable only when provided by a
               commercial  concern - Lower authorities holding  that assessee operating as
               proprietorship concern would be covered under term ‘commercial concern’ -
                                    GST LAW TIMES      11th June 2020      147
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152