Page 109 - GSTL_18th June 2020_Vol 37_Part 3
P. 109

2020 ]    SURYA ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & S.T., CHENNAI-III  323
                            (iii)  requiring production of accounts, documents or other evi-
                                 dence under the Chapter or the rules made thereunder; or
                       (b)   an audit has been initiated, and such inquiry, investigation or audit
                            is pending as on the 1st day of March, 2013, then, the designated au-
                            thority shall, by an order, and for reasons to be recorded in writing,
                            reject such declaration.
                       6.  The contention of the department is that  an  audit was  initiated
               against the appellant and, therefore, the VCES application cannot be entertained.
               It is stated that on 26-11-2012, they had visited the premises of the appellant. This
               fact is denied by the appellant. As per the Board’s clarification, what constitutes
               the ‘initiation of audit’ is clarified as under :-

                         S.          Issues                   Clarification
                        No.
                        19  In   terms   of  Section Initiation of audit : For the purposes of
                            106(2)(b), if a declaration  VCES, the date of the visit of auditors to
                            made by a  person against  the Unit of the taxpayer would be taken as
                            whom an audit  has been  the date of initiation of audit. A register is
                            initiated and where such audit  maintained of all visits for audit purposes.
                            is pending, then the desig-
                            nated authority shall by an
                            order and for reasons to be   Culmination of audit : The audit pro-
                            recorded in writing, reject   cess may culminate in any of the fol-
                            such declaration. As the   lowing manner :-
                            audit process  may involve  (i)   Closure of audit file if no  dis-
                            several stages, it may be   crepancy is found in audit;
                            indicated as to what event   (ii)  Closure of audit para by the
                            would constitute.-          Monitoring Committee Meeting
                                                        (MCM);
                            (i)  Initiation of audit; and  (iii)  Approval of audit para by MCM
                                                        and payment of amount in-
                                                        volved therein by the  party in
                            (ii)  Culmination of audit.   terms of the  provisions of  the
                                                        Finance Act, 1994;
                                                    (iv)  Approval of audit para by
                                                        MCM, and issuance of SCN, if
                                                        party does not agree to the para
                                                        so raised.
                                                    The audit culminates at a point when
                                                    the audit  paras raised are  settled  in
                                                    any manner as stated above.
                                                    The pendency of audit as on 1-3-2013
                                                    means an audit that has been initiated
                                                    before 1-3-2013 but has not culminat-
                                                    ed as on 1-3-2013.




                                    GST LAW TIMES      18th June 2020      109
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114