Page 113 - GSTL_18th June 2020_Vol 37_Part 3
P. 113

2020 ]  PUSHPENDRA KUMAR JAIN v. COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & S.T., VADODARA-II 327
                                                ORDER
                       6.  The appeal is  allowed with consequential relief. The Order No.
               NSK/EXCUS/SSP/APPL/052/18-19, dated 31st May, 2018 passed by the Com-
               missioner (Appeals), Central GST & C. Excise, Nashik is hereby set aside.
                                (Order pronounced in the Court on 3-2-2020)

                                                _______

                             2020 (37) G.S.T.L. 327 (Tri. - Ahmd.)

                        IN THE CESTAT, WEST ZONAL BENCH, AHMEDABAD
                                           [COURT NO. III]
                         S/Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (J) and Raju, Member (T)
                                  PUSHPENDRA KUMAR JAIN
                                                Versus
                      COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & S.T., VADODARA-II
                  Final Order Nos. A/10247-10248/2020-WZB/AHD, dated 24-1-2020 in Appeal
                                         Nos. E/809 & 827/2011
                       Cenvat credit - Input service - Scientific and Technical Consultancy
               services - Appellant directly involved in Supervision and Monitoring even the
               time schedule and development was being decided mutually while the tech-
               nology was being developed by SPIL - Service provided in a particular time
               duration and the service provided was being simultaneously used by appel-
               lant by Supervising and Monitoring the  activity in the  entire duration  -
               Accordingly, Cenvat credit admissible - Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
               [paras 9, 10, 11, 12]
                                                                         Appeal allowed
                                             CASES CITED
               Finolex Cables Ltd. v. Commissioner — 2007 (210) E.L.T. 76 (Tribunal) — Referred ...................... [Para 4]
               Mercedes Benz Research and Development India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner
                    — 2017 (49) S.T.R. 227 (Tribunal) — Referred .............................................................................. [Para 4]
                       REPRESENTED BY :     Shri Kiran Sambhu, Advocate, for the Appellant.
                                            Shri T.K. Sikdar, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for
                                            the Respondent.
                       [Order per : Raju, Member (T)]. -  This appeal has been filed by M/s.
               Unimed Technologies Limited and Shri P.K. Jain (GM) against Order demanding
               Service Tax, Interest and imposing penalty under Section 11AC read with Rule
               15(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules and under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules,
               2002.
                       2.  The appellant M/s. Unimed Technologies Limited entered into sepa-
               rate  agreements with M/s. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industry  Limited (SPIL)  and
               M/s. Sun Pharma Advance Research Company Limited (SPARC) for carrying
               out research and development and transfer of developed technology/know-how
               for manufacture of various pharmaceuticals products. Accordingly, SPIL &
                                    GST LAW TIMES      18th June 2020      113
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118