Page 10 - GSTL_2nd July 2020 _Vol 38_Part 1
P. 10

viii                          GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 38
                                        sending order at recorded address - Delay not condoned - Section 100 of
                                        Central Goods and Services Tax Act,  2017 —  Smaaash Leisure Ltd.  v.
                                        Commissioner of CGST, New Delhi (Tri. - Del.) .......................  47
                                     Assessment under GST - Best judgment assessment - Non-filing of return
                                        Form GSTR-3B - In terms of Section 62 of Central Goods and Services Tax
                                        Act, 2017 read with  Rule 61 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules,
                                        2017, best judgment assessment can be resorted only if dealer fails to file
                                        return specified under Section 39 ibid - Under this provision, this return
                                        has to be only GSTR-3 and not GSTR-3B - Settled by Gujarat High Court
                                        in 2019 (26) G.S.T.L. 481  (Guj.) that return in Form GSTR-3B is  an
                                        independent return prescribed under GST law and not in lieu of return in
                                        Form GSTR-3 and hence not covered under Section 39 ibid - Thus, mere
                                        non-filing of GSTR-3B cannot be a ground for best judgment assessment -
                                        Impugned order being without jurisdiction is non est/void - Section 62 of
                                        Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — In Re : Omsai Professional Detective
                                        and Security Services Pvt. Ltd. (Appellate Authority - A.P.) .................. 120
                                     — Best judgment assessment - Scope of - Said assessment cannot be done on
                                        the basis of surmises and/or conjectures but by taking into account all
                                        relevant material already available or as gathered from other sources - In
                                        instant case, appellant had already filed return in Form GSTR-1 wherein
                                        exact value of outward supplies were made available  - Thus, inflating
                                        such  value by 150% for  purpose of  said assessment has no basis -
                                        Nothing on record indicates that valuation of supplies declared in Form
                                        GSTR-1 was  suppressed - No effort  was made to  gather any  material
                                        from other  sources to counter declared value - Whimsical  and
                                        unsubstantiated basis  of assessment not sustainable as same is  not in
                                        accordance of settled guidelines - In view of above, tax liability modified
                                        and confined to actual figures of  outward supply reflected in GSTR-1
                                        return - Section 62 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — In Re :
                                        Omsai Professional Detective and Security Services Pvt. Ltd. (Appellate Authority - A.P.) ..... 120
                                     Banking and Other Financial Institution services, taxability of corporate
                                        guarantee - See under CORPORATE GUARANTEE ...............  56
                                     Best judgment assessment under GST, scope of - See under ASSESSMENT  . .    120
                                     Binding precedent - Decisions of jurisdictional High Court are required to
                                        be followed in preference over non-jurisdictional High Court decisions -
                                        See under PRECEDENCE..............................  98
                                     Business Auxiliary Service - Demand not sustainable as dropping of
                                        demand in respect of similar situated assessee already stands finalized -
                                        See under DEMAND  ................................  78
                                     — exported, refund of Service Tax admissible notwithstanding receipt of
                                        consideration Indian currency as retention of amount received from local
                                        customers - See under REFUND/REFUND CLAIM ...............  40
                                     — not applicable on providing educational service under revenue sharing
                                        model - See under DEMAND  ...........................  78
                                     Business Support Services  - Joint Venture Agreement - Services provided
                                        under Joint  Venture Agreement during period prior to 1-7-2012  not
                                        taxable when there is no relationship  of service provider or  service
                                        receiver  between the parties to such agreement and no consideration
                                        received by either side for rendition of such service rather profit/loss
                                        arising out  of such business shared  by  both parties -  Sections 65(104c)
                                        and 65(105)(zzzq) of Finance Act, 1994 — Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa v.
                                        Vainguinim Valley Resort (Tri. - Mumbai) .........................  49
                                                           GST LAW TIMES      2nd July 2020      10
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15