Page 106 - GSTL_6th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 1
P. 106

32                            GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 39
                                                                     ORDER
                                            7.  For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the questions are
                                     answered thus -
                                             Question 1.  Whether Futuredent is required to pay IGST under reverse
                                                        charge mechanism on intermediary services received from
                                                        Fair Relations GmbH (Germany)?
                                             Answer :-   Not answered in view of discussions made above.
                                             Question 2.  If answer to above question is yes (i.e. GST payable), Since
                                                        Futuredent has other business verticals as well in the same
                                                        entity, whether Futuredent will  get ITC on such RCM
                                                        paid?
                                             Answer :-   Not answered in view of answer to  question number 1
                                                        above.

                                                                     _______

                                               2020 (39) G.S.T.L. 32 (A.A.R. - GST - T.N.)

                                         BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING UNDER GST,
                                                                  TAMIL NADU
                                                  Ms. Manasa Gangotri Kata, Member (CGST) and
                                                   Thiru Kurinji Selvaan V.S., Member (TNGST)
                                                       IN RE : RAJESH RAMA VARMA
                                            Order No. 20/ARA/2020, dated 24-4-2020 in Application Sl. No. 50
                                            Consultancy services - Applicant engaged in the business of providing
                                     IT software related consulting services in the area of Oracle ERP w.r.t. Oracle
                                     Financials - Support services provided directly to US client by him on behalf
                                     of the Principal, Doyen Systems - However, applicant not a party to contract
                                     between Principal and foreign client - As far as the clients are concerned, ser-
                                     vices are provided by Principal only - Consideration to be paid to applicant by
                                     Principal and not foreign client - Thus, applicant provides services as a ‘Con-
                                     sultant’ engaged by Principal and hence the receiver of service in this case is
                                     the Principal as per definition in Section 2(93)(a) of Central Goods and Ser-
                                     vices Tax Act, 2017 - Merely because, applicant having e-mail correspondence
                                     with the employees of clients of Doyen not means that he is ‘carrying on the
                                     business of supply of services’ on behalf of Doyen, as is required as per defi-
                                     nition of ‘agent’ in Section 2(5) ibid - Such services being supplied for a con-
                                     sultancy fee, is a supply of services as per Para 5 of Schedule II read with Sec-
                                     tion 7(1)(a) ibid - Applicant liable to pay GST at appropriate rates on the sup-
                                     ply of consultancy services to Doyen. [paras 7.2, 7.3]
                                            Advance  Ruling -  Jurisdiction - Questions whether, such supply of
                                     services  is ‘export of services’, ‘zero-rated supply’ and  eligibility of refund,
                                     this authority’ not answered, being not within the ambit of this authority - Sec-
                                     tion 97(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Tamil Nadu Goods and
                                     Services Tax Act, 2017. [para 7.4]
                                                                                Ruling in favour of department
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      6th August 2020      106
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111