Page 107 - GSTL_6th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 1
P. 107

2020 ]                    IN RE : RAJESH RAMA VARMA                   33
                                             CASES CITED
               National Engineering Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner
                    — 2011 (24) S.T.R. 683 (Tribunal) — Referred ........................................................................... [Para 2.5]
               Support.com India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner — Appeal Nos. ST/20175-20184/2017-SM
                    and ST/20914/2016 — Referred .................................................................................................. [Para 2.5]
                       [Order]. -  Shri Rajesh  Rama Varma, Tower-5, 403  Sky Dugar,  Rajank-
               uppam  Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu  600095,  (hereinafter referred to as ‘Appli-
               cant’)  is a sole proprietory concern  registered  under GST Act with GSTIN :
               33ABAPV7712P1Z7. The Applicant has preferred an application seeking Ad-
               vance Ruling on the following Question :
                       (a)  Whether the services provided by the applicant to the foreign client
                           through the Principal shall be treated as export of services as the fi-
                           nal  services claimed by the Principal is in the nature of export of
                           services.
                       (b)  If the services are treated as export of services if so whether he is el-
                           igible to claim the taxes paid towards such export of services as re-
                           fund.
                       (c)  Whether the payment of fees received by him in INR from the Prin-
                           cipal shall be treated as Export Remittance as the Principal is receiv-
                           ing the export proceeds in his account based on which the payment
                           is made to him in INR keeping in view the various judgments in the
                           matter cited above.
                       (d)  Whether he can raise invoices with IGST taxes instead of CGST +
                           SGST going forward for claiming refund.
                       (e)  Any consequential relief or directions if any as deemed fit.
               The Applicant has submitted the copy of application in Form GST ARA-01 and
               submitted a copy of Challan evidencing payment of application fees of Rs. 5,000/
               - each under sub-rule (1) of Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and SGST Rules, 2017.
                       2.1  The  applicant has stated that he is engaged  in the business  of
               providing IT software related consulting services in the area of Oracle ERP w.r.t.
               Oracle Financials. The major services provided by him broadly  include imple-
               mentation, enhancement, support services and any other services that fall within
               the ambit of the Oracle Financials sphere. The services provided by him currently
               are covered under the SAC (Service Accounting Code) 998313. These services are
               being provided by him to both Indian and Foreign clients requesting the services.
               In Jan., 2019, he entered into a contract with a GST registered IT Company in In-
               dia providing similar Oracle services (hereinafter referred to as ‘Principal’,. As
               part of the Contract his role was that of a Consultant to provide support services
               to the Oracle ERP owned by the US client based out of Boston. The original con-
               tract was between the Principal and the US client and a part of the service was
               contracted to him. As per the terms of the contract, the consultancy fee for his
               services was decided to be billed on an hourly basis in USD of $33.90 per/hr. The
               fee was decided to be paid in equivalent INR based on the conversion rate of
               INR/USD on the  average prevailing rate of the  last 3 month.  The GST taxes
               would be charged separately while raising the invoice by him on the Principal.
               The contract is currently in force and valid till December, 2021.
                       2.2  As part of the service obligation on the contract he was required to
               undertake the following activities on a monthly basis.

                                    GST LAW TIMES      6th August 2020      107
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112