Page 205 - ELT_1st July 2020_Vol 373_Part 1
P. 205

2020 ]   RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, KANDLA   115

               is published and offered for sale. This judgment  has been affirmed by the
               Hon’ble Supreme Court by dismissing the petition for SLP filed by the revenue
               reported at Union of India v. M.D. Overseas Ltd. - 2017 (356) E.L.T. A136 (S.C.). In
               view of the settled legal position he prays for setting aside the impugned order.
                       3.  Shri Sanjiv Kinker, Learned Superintendent (Authorized Representa-
               tive) appearing on behalf of the revenue reiterates the finding of the impugned
               order.
                       4.  We heard both the sides and perused the records. The issue to be de-
               cided is whether the Notification No. 120/2003, dated 1-8-2003 is effective from
               the date of publication i.e. 1-8-2003 as proposed by the revenue or from the date
               of offer for sale of the said notification i.e. 4-8-2003 as claimed by the appellant.
               In this regard, relevant Section 25(4)(a)(b) is reproduced below, which is preva-
               lent at the relevant time :-
                       “Section 25
                       (4)  Every notification issued under sub-section (1) [or sub-section (2A)]
                       shall, -
                            (a)  Unless otherwise provided, come into force on the date of its
                                 issue by the Central Government for publication in the Official
                                 Gazette;
                            (b)  also be published and offered for sale on the date of its issue
                                 by the Directorate of Publicity nd Public Relations of the
                                 Board, New Delhi”
                       4.1  From the above section, particularly from clause (b) it is clear that
               the notification shall come into force when the notification is issued, published in
               the Official Gazette and also offered for sale. Therefore, all the three event are
               necessary i.e. notification should be issued, published in the Official Gazette of
               Central Government and offered for sale, that means the date on which the noti-
               fication is offered for sale shall be the relevant effective date of notification, even
               though, the date of issue of notification and publication is prior to the date of
               offer for sale. As regard the factual position, on the above dates the appellant
               have obtained a reply under RTI which is reproduced below :-
                                        GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
                                     DEPARTMENT OF PUBLICATION
                                        CIVIL LINES, DELHI 110054
                                        Website : www.deptpub.gov.in
                                   Email : acop-dep@nic.in (&) pub.dep@nic.in
                                   TEL. : 23817823, 23819689 Fax : 23817846
                         File No. O&M/19104/2015       Dated : 7th August, 2015
                       To
                       Shri Pawan Awasthi
                       LIG-171, 2nd Floor
                       Rose Apartment, Sec-18-B
                       Dwarka, New Delhi 110078

                       Sub :   Information under RTI Act, 2005

                                     EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st July 2020      205
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210