Page 186 - ELT_15th July 2020_Vol 373_Part 2
P. 186

168                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 373
                                     better mechanism/policy  for allotment of quota so as  to make the process
                                     much more competitive transparent, fair and reasonable - Article 14 of Consti-
                                     tution of India. [paras 14, 18]
                                                                                       Application disposed of
                                                                  CASES CITED
                                     Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India — (2012) 3 SCC 1 — Relied on ............ [Paras 7, 16]
                                     Chailihari Trading Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India — Civil Writ Petition No. 7469 of 2019,
                                         decided on 28-8-2019 by Bombay High Court — Referred ..................................................... [Para 14]
                                     Devki Global Capital Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India — Writ Petition (C) No. 7676 of 2019,
                                         dated 11-9-2019 by Delhi High Court — Relied on ................................................................... [Para 19]
                                     Pawan Bhatia v. State of Haryana — (2015) 4 RCR (Civil) 666 — Referred ............................... [Paras 8, 18]
                                     Raj Kumar Chaudhary v. State of U.P. — (2012) 5 ADJ 427 — Referred .................................... [Paras 8, 17]
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      S/Shri Jay  N.  Shah, Jaimin  R. Dave and Ms.
                                                                  Namrata J. Shah, for the Petitioner.
                                                                  S/Shri  Devang  Vyas and  Nirzar S. Desai, for the
                                                                  Respondent.
                                            [Judgment per : J.B. Pardiwala, J. (Oral)]. - By this writ-application un-
                                     der Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant, a proprietary firm,
                                     through its proprietor, has prayed for the following reliefs :
                                            “...that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ
                                            in the nature of mandamus or a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of cer-
                                            tiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order and be pleased to :
                                                  (a)  Quash and set aside Public Notice No. PS-11/2019, dated 13th
                                                      September, 2019 at Annexure-F;
                                                  In the alternate
                                                  (b)  Direct Respondent No. 2 herein to streamline the procedure
                                                      for Import of Poppy Seeds in India from Turkey pursuant to
                                                      Public Notice No. PS-11/2019, dated 13th September, 2019 so
                                                      as to ensure that procedure is fair, reasonable, transparent and
                                                      open to all the importers;
                                                  (c)   Pending the hearing and final  disposal of  the petition, stay
                                                      implementation and operation of Public Notice No.  PS-
                                                      11/2019, dated 13th September, 2019 and direction to not reg-
                                                      ister  contracts or issue permits to  import of Poppy Seeds
                                                      (WPS) from Turkey to India in accordance with Public Notice
                                                      No. PS-11/2019, dated 13th September, 2019.
                                                  (d)  Any other relief as may be deemed fit in the interest of justice.
                                                  (e)   To provide for the cost of this petition.”
                                            2.  The writ-applicant seeks to challenge the guidelines dated 13th Sep-
                                     tember, 2019 for the registration of the sales contract for the import of the poppy
                                     seeds from Turkey to India issued vide Public Notice No. PS-11-2019. The chal-
                                     lenge is substantially on the following three grounds :
                                            (1)  The amended policy dated 25-6-2019 which is now substituted by
                                                 the policy dated 13-9-2019 is manifestly unjust and handmade for
                                                 the purpose of favouring few big players.
                                            (2)  The practice ‘first come first serve basis’ adopted in distributing the
                                                 State largesse is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

                                                          EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th July 2020      186
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191