Page 289 - ELT_15th July 2020_Vol 373_Part 2
P. 289

2020 ]  BIRD RETAIL PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT), NEW DELHI  271

                           upon them under Section 112 and/or 114AA of the Customs Act,
                           1962, as discussed in paras above”.
                       (C)  Now, therefore, M/s. Bird Retail Pvt. Ltd., E-9, Connaught House,
                           Connaught Place, New Delhi  - 110 001 are hereby called  upon to
                           show cause to the Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Customs, In-
                           land Container Depot, Patparganj, Delhi within 30 days of the re-
                           ceipt of this notice, as to why -
                            (1)  The Lithium Ion Batteries (which were the essential part of the
                            Segway (electrically operated)  imported by them in parts with
                            Gear Box/Power Base in Pre-assembled form vide Bill of Entry No.
                            5146942, dated 4-5-2016  at New Custom House,  Air Cargo (Im-
                            port), Near  I.G.I. Airport, New Delhi)  imported by them by
                            misdeclaration as Lithium Ion Batteries for Segway for captive con-
                            sumption vide B/E No. 5413240, dated 27-5-2016 as detailed in Se-
                            rial No. 10 of Annexure - A to this Show Cause Notice, should not
                            be classified under CTH 8711 90 91 as part of the complete Segway
                            and BCD @ 30% should not be charged in view of Notification No.
                            12/2012-Cus. [Serial No. 443(1)(b)], dated 17-3-2012, as amended,
                            towards the import of these goods;
                            (2)  The seized goods valued at Rs. 7,64,643/- should not be con-
                            fiscated under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962;
                            (3)  The imported goods  valued at Rs. 1,91,161/- other than the
                            seized goods, as mentioned in Sr. No. (i) above should not be held
                            liable  for confiscation  under Section  111(m) of the  Customs Act,
                            1962;
                            (4)  The differential Customs duty  amounting to Rs. 2,32,032/-
                            (Rupees Two Lacs Thirty Two Thousand  and Thirty Two only)
                            evaded/short paid by them as detailed in Serial No. 10 to Annex-
                            ure - A to the show cause notice should not be demanded and re-
                            covered from them by invoking the extended period as per provi-
                            sions of Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962;
                            (5)  Interest should not be demanded and recovered from them on
                            the aforesaid evaded/short paid Customs duty in terms of Section
                            28AA of the Customs Act, 1962;
                            (6)  Penalty  should not be imposed upon them under Sections
                            114A and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962, as discussed in paras
                            above;
                       (C1) Now, therefore, that Shri Ankur Bhatia, Director of M/s. Bird Retail
                           Pvt. Ltd., E-9, Connaught House, Connaught Place, New Delhi - 110
                           001 and Shri Rony Abraham, Manager (Sales), M/s. Bird Retail Pvt.
                           Ltd., E-9, Connaught House, Connaught Place, New Delhi - 110 001
                           are hereby called upon to show cause to  the Deputy/Assistant
                           Commissioner of Customs, Inland Container Depot, Patparganj,
                           Delhi within 30 days of the receipt of this notice, as to why penalty
                           should not be imposed upon them under Section 112 and/or 114AA
                           of the Customs Act, 1962, as discussed in paras above”.
                       4.  The matter has been got adjudicated vide order-in-original  No.
               1/19/Pr. Commr./Import/ICD/TKD dated 28 January 2019. Vide the impugned

                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th July 2020      289
   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294