Page 25 - ELT_1st September 2020_Vol 373_Part 5
P. 25

2020 ]                    INDEX -  1st September, 2020              xxiii
               Valuation (Customs) (Contd.)
               — Transaction value - Enhancement of - Undervaluation and misdeclaration
                  of PVC Laminated sheets imported from Thailand, allegation of - HELD :
                  Revenue’s allegation that supplier of goods appears to be trader and not
                  manufacturer having no the basis - Goods imported under ASEAN
                  Agreement between two Sovereign States and if Department having any
                  reason  or doubt regarding source of supply of  material, department
                  could have taken appropriate steps to  blacklist supplier - Moreover,
                  report of Central Institute of Plastic Engineering and Technology
                  (CIPET), observing that PVC content is 51% and that LDPE and LLDPE,
                  raw material for impugned goods, not been considered by Commissioner
                  - Information relied upon by Commissioner available in Public Domain
                  not admissible as evidence in law when there is specific test report
                  available of authorized agency - Further, reliance placed by
                  Commissioner upon imports from China cannot be considered as
                  contemporaneous import in case  of goods imported from Thailand -
                  Department failed to establish charge of undervaluation through proper
                  methods known to law  of valuation under Customs as instead of
                  collecting proper data regarding price at which goods of the like kind
                  and quality being imported, department resorted to Rule 9 of Customs
                  Valuation (Determination  of Value  of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 -
                  Impugned orders re-fixing price not sustainable in law - Therefore,
                  impugned order set aside - Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962 —  Karachira
                  Coir Manufacturers v. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin (Tri. - Bang.) ............  709
               Vessels - Dredgers are ocean going vessels - See under DREDGER  ........  662
               Violation of law, equality cannot be claimed - See under EXIM ..........  581
               Waiver  of demurrage charges, scope of - See under DEMURRAGE
                  CHARGES......................................  666
               — of demurrage, scope of  issuing  Detention Certificate by Customs - See
                  under DEMURRAGE ................................  631
               WORDS AND PHRASES :
               — Demurrage - It is collected by Custodian of import or export goods for
                  delay in removal and for occupying space within its space beyond time
                  given — Qatar Airways v. Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai (Mad.) .........  631
               — Detention  Certificate - It issued by  Customs authorities to importer to
                  claim waiver  from demurrage for  Port  —  Qatar Airways  v. Commissioner of
                  Customs (Air), Chennai (Mad.) ..............................  631
               — Detention charges - They are charged when import containers have been
                  picked up, continue to be in possession  of consignee  and not returned
                  within allotted time - It is  private arrangement/contract between liner
                  and consignee — Qatar Airways v. Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai (Mad.) ....  631
               Writ jurisdiction  - Maintainability - Existence of alternative remedy -
                  Refund of excess duty - No refund application filed - Petitioner cannot
                  circumvent statutory provisions prescribed under Section 27 of Customs
                  Act, 1962 by invoking writ jurisdiction - Relief not granted - Article 226 of
                  Constitution of India — Mate (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Commr. of Cus., Inland Container
                  Depot (Del.) ......................................  666

                                   EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st September 2020      25
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30