Page 161 - GSTL_26th March 2020_Vol 34_Part 4
P. 161

2020 ]                    IN RE : YKK INDIA PVT. LTD.                671
               Case law in 2015 (37) S.T.R. 684 (Uttarakhand), relied by appellant has been
               departed in 2018 (10) G.S.T.L. 288 (All.) - Section 17(5) of Central Goods and
               Services Tax Act, 2017/Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. [para 15]
                       Rent-a-Cab services - Any commercial vehicle hired for transportation
               of passengers is fully covered under aforesaid services - It  includes rent-
               ing/hiring of motor cars, motor cabs, maxi cabs, minibuses, buses and all other
               motor  vehicles which  are designed  to carry passengers, irrespective of their
               capacity to carry  passengers -  Appellant’s contention  that hiring of buses
               which can carry large number of passengers would not qualify under “rent-a-
               cab” not tenable - Section 17(5)  of Central Goods  and Services Tax Act,
               2017/Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. [para 14]
                                                                  Appeal partly allowed
                                             CASES CITED
               ACIT v. Hindustan Milk Foods — (1975) 98 ITR 441 — Referred ....................................................... [Para 9]
               Anil Kumar Agnihotri v. Commissioner — 2018 (10) G.S.T.L. 288 (All.) — Relied on ............... [Para 15.2]
               Bharat Travels Co. v. Commissioner — 2010 (20) S.T.R. 646 (Tribunal) — Referred ....................... [Para 9]
               Commissioner v. Maruti Suzuki India Pvt. Ltd. — 2017 (49) S.T.R. 261 (P & H) — Referred ......... [Para 9]
               Commissioner v. Sachin Malhotra
                    — 2015 (37) S.T.R. 684 (Uttarakhand) — Distinguished ................................ [Paras 9, 11.3, 15, 15.2]
               Commissioner v. Vijay Travels — 2014 (36) S.T.R. 513 (Guj.) — Referred ......................................... [Para 9]
               Commissioner v. Vijay Travels — 2016 (43) S.T.R. J172 (S.C.) — Referred ........................................ [Para 9]
               Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner
                    — 1991 (55) E.L.T. 437 (S.C.) — Referred ...................................................................................... [Para 9]
               Orkay Silk Mills Limited v. M.S. Bindra — 1988 (33) E.L.T. 48 (Bom.) — Referred.......................... [Para 9]
               Oryx Fisheries (P) Ltd. v. Union of India — 2011 (266) E.L.T. 422 (S.C.) — Referred ...................... [Para 9]
               Parle Agro (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
                    — 2017 (352) E.L.T. 113 (S.C.) — Referred .................................................................................... [Para 9]
               R.S. Travels v. Commissioner — 2008 (12) S.T.R. 27 (Tribunal) — Referred ...................................... [Para 9]
               Siemens Engineering and Manufacturing. Co. of India Ltd. v. Union of India
                    — (1976) 2 SCC 981 — Referred ...................................................................................................... [Para 9]
               Union of India v. Suksha International & Nutan Gems
                    — 1989 (39) E.L.T. 503 (S.C.) — Referred ...................................................................................... [Para 9]
               Union of India v. Wood Papers Ltd. — 1990 (47) E.L.T. 500 (S.C.) — Referred ................................ [Para 9]
                       [Order]. - Brief Facts of the Case : The present appeal has been preferred
               by the applicant M/s. YKK India Pvt Ltd., Plot No. 699, Sector-2, Plot No. 122,
               Sector-6, HSIIDC, Growth Centre Bawal, District Rewari, Haryana [YKK in short]
               against the Advance  Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2017-18/04, dated 11-7-2018
               [2019 (22) G.S.T.L.  115 (A.A.R. - GST)] passed in their application dated  16-4-
               2018.
                       2.  The applicant namely M/s. YKK India Pvt. Ltd, (YKK) are engaged
               in the business of supply of slide fasteners, chains, sliders, etc. (Zipper or Final
               Product). In furtherance of its business of supply of the said final products men-
               tioned above, YKK uses various goods and services for which the applicable tax
               under the CGST Act or the relevant State Act or Union Territory Acts under GST
               regime or Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 are paid to the supplier,
               which falls within the meaning and definition of input tax defined under Section
               2(62) of the Act.
                       3.  M/s. YKK has its unit at Plot No. 699, Sector-2, Plot No. 122, Sector-
               6, HSIIDC, Growth Centre Bawal, District Rewari, Haryana, here the employees
               of the appellant are engaged in manufacturing the Final Products. Further, apart
                                    GST LAW TIMES      26th March 2020      257
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166