Page 21 - GSTL_2nd April 2020_Vol 35_Part 1
P. 21

2020 ]                      INDEX - 2nd April, 2020                   xix
                  penalty and on payment of same or on furnishing security of amount
                  payable, goods and vehicle shall be released - It is also provided that if
                  payment ibid is made/secured, proceedings initiated under Section
                  129(3) ibid shall be deemed to be  concluded - Clearly, adjudication
                  proceedings thereafter are independent of this procedure - In this case,
                  petitioner has already furnished security in form of Bank Guarantee of
                  amount specified by Revenue in  manner as  required, on the basis of
                  which goods and vehicle have already been released - Therefore, issuance
                  of notice  under Section  129(3) ibid, citing Apex Court decision in 2019
                  (31) G.S.T.L. 385 (S.C.), is infructuous -  Apex Court in its decision ibid
                  had only directed that release of goods  has to be in terms  of statutory
                  provisions, which has already been done in this case - In view of above,
                  Revenue Authorities are directed to adjudicate case on merits within 3
                  months - Till then Bank Guarantee shall remain valid with Revenue and
                  its invocation is subject to outcome of  adjudication - Section  129  of
                  Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Uttar Pradesh Goods and
                  Services Tax  Act, 2017 - Article 226 of  Constitution  of India —  Skipper
                  Limited v. Union of India (All.) ............................... 67
               Documents  - Fake and fabricated documents generated to avail ITC,
                  anticipatory bail granted to accused - See under BAIL  .............. 19
               Drawback  claimed inadvertently during transition  period on export of
                  goods, refund of IGST not deniable - See under REFUND/REFUND
                  CLAIM ........................................ 22
               Dual investigations on same issue under GST, sustainability thereof - See
                  under INVESTIGATIONS .............................. 36
               — under GST, scope of applicability of bar thereon - See  under
                  INVESTIGATIONS ..................................  4
               Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - See under CENVAT CREDIT .......  121
               Employment Termination Facilitation service  - Employees quitting
                  employment  without serving during  notice period - Amount received
                  from them by the employer equal to salary for the said period not taxable
                  under Section 66E(e) of Finance Act, 1994 as employer not rendered any
                  taxable service or tolerated any act of the employee  but has  merely
                  facilitated sudden exit of employees  by imposing cost upon them for
                  such an act - Notice pay in lieu of sudden termination does not give rise
                  to rendition of service either by employer or by employees - Section 65 of
                  Finance Act,  1994 —  GE T &  D India  Limited  v. Deputy Commissioner of C. Ex.,
                  Chennai (Mad.) ...................................... 89
               Enquiry  in respect of availment of  ITC without  receipt of goods, writ
                  jurisdiction not invocable for staying summons - See under WRIT
                  JURISDICTION .................................... 71
               Erection, Commissioning or  Installation services,  input service credit
                  admissible - See under CENVAT CREDIT  ....................  118
               Error - IGST refund on exports during transitional period not deniable for
                  inadvertent and unintentional error  of claiming drawback - See under
                  REFUND/REFUND CLAIM  ............................ 22
               Ex parte re-assessment order not sustainable - See under RE-ASSESSMENT .... 92
               Exemption  -  Change in law - Migration to GST - Doctrine of promissory
                  estoppel - Plea of promissory estoppel cannot be enforced  against  an  act
                                     GST LAW TIMES      2nd April 2020      85
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26