Page 26 - GSTL_2nd April 2020_Vol 35_Part 1
P. 26

xxiv                          GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 35
                                     Invoices - Fraudulent ITC passing by issuance of Invoices without supply of
                                        goods, scope of Bail to CA for connivance - See under BAIL  ..........  32
                                     Jurisdiction of AAR  - Interpretation  of Section 97(2) of CGST Act - See
                                        under INTERPRETATION OF STATUTE .....................  40
                                     — on place of supply for export of services, AAR has jurisdiction - See under
                                        ADVANCE RULING AUTHORITY ........................  40
                                     KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 :
                                     — Section 39 - See under RE-ASSESSMENT  .....................  92
                                     KERALA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 :
                                     — Section 129 - See under DETENTION  .......................  78
                                     Levy  of IGST on ocean freight for supply/delivery of goods at Port - See
                                        under INTEGRATED GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (IGST)  ..........  82
                                     — of VAT  on photographic services - See under PHOTOGRAPHIC
                                        SERVICES ......................................  75
                                     Limitation for appeal - Delay when condonable/not condonable - See under
                                        APPEAL ....................................... 141
                                     Limitation for demand - Extended period when applicable/inapplicable  -
                                        See under DEMAND  ................................ 123
                                     Limitation for refund - See under REFUND/REFUND/REFUND CLAIM  ....  52,
                                              .....................................  129, 135
                                     Medical Insurance  for employees  of service provider, matter  referred to
                                        Larger Bench of Tribunal on admissibility of credit - See under CENVAT
                                        CREDIT ....................................... 121
                                     Migration to GST,  exemption under Area Based Exemption scheme not
                                        admissible - See under AREA BASED EXEMPTION ...............  99
                                     Mistake of law in paying service tax,  refund not deniable - See under
                                        REFUND/REFUND CLAIM ............................  52
                                     — in payment of service tax, limitation for  refund - See under
                                        REFUND/REFUND CLAIM ............................  52
                                     Mistaken payment of service tax, limitation for refund applicable - See
                                        under REFUND/REFUND CLAIM  ........................ 129
                                     Natural justice violated on suo motu adjustment of refund for revovery of
                                        dues - See under RECOVERY  ...........................  18
                                     Non-speaking order of appellate Tribunal on refund of service tax on Port
                                        services, not sustainable - See under APPELLATE TRIBUNAL .........  29
                                     Notice for confiscation of goods  - Form GST  MOV-10 - Time-limit for
                                        payment of tax after detention - Applicability - In earlier interim order in
                                        main writ filed against issuance of GST MOV-07 and GST MOV-09, this
                                        Court had directed release of detained/seized goods and vehicle  on
                                        payment of 50% of tax and penalty involved and filing bank guarantee
                                        for  balance 50%, which were duly  complied with by petitioner within
                                        time-limit granted in said interim order - Therefore, issuance of notice for
                                        confiscation of goods by issuing GST MOV-10 on the ground that amount
                                        of tax had not been deposited within 14 days of detention of goods, is
                                        erroneous and is against specific directions of Court - Not clear as to how
                                        aforesaid period of 14 days has been mentioned in impugned notice -
                                                           GST LAW TIMES      2nd April 2020      90
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31