Page 28 - GSTL_2nd April 2020_Vol 35_Part 1
P. 28

xxvi                          GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 35
                                     Port services  - Non-speaking order of appellate Tribunal on refund of
                                        service tax not sustainable - See under APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ........ 29
                                     Powers of Tribunal  to grant refund  beyond time-limit - See under
                                        REFUND/REFUND CLAIM ............................ 129
                                     Procedure under GST law for release of goods and vehicle seized/detained
                                        during transit - See under DETENTION/SEIZURE  ...............  67
                                     Promissory estoppel cannot be enforced against an Act done in accordance
                                        with statutory provisions of law - See under EXEMPTION  ...........  99
                                     — not applicable on area based exemptions after introduction of GST - See
                                        under AREA BASED EXEMPTION  ........................  99
                                     Quitting employment without serving during notice period, service tax not
                                        levaible  on  amount   received  -  See  under  EMPLOYMENT
                                        TERMINATION FACILITATION SERVICE  ...................  89
                                     R & D Cess - Recipient of transfer of technology services from abroad, scope
                                        of admissibility of exemption from service tax to extent R & D Cess - See
                                        under CESS  ..................................... 123
                                     Re-assessment  - Ex parte order - Assignment note issued to Deputy
                                        Commissioner relating to tax periods 2010-2011 and 2011-2012
                                        considered to be assignment issued even to tax period 2012-2013
                                        resulting in issuance of re-assessment notice to reassess assessee for tax
                                        period 2012-2013 - Jurisdiction of officers to proceed with reassessment
                                        relating to tax period 2012-2013 not clear amongst concerned authorities -
                                        Assessee appeared before authority who issued notice - Said ought to
                                        have transferred proceedings initiated by him  before competent
                                        authority - Ex parte reassessment order to be set aside - Proceedings
                                        remitted to competent authority to redo assessment after providing
                                        opportunity of hearing to assessee - Section 39 of Karnataka Value Added
                                        Tax Act, 2003 — Suma Oil Agencies v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bengaluru
                                        (Kar.)   .........................................  92
                                     Recipient of transfer  of technology services from abroad, scope of
                                        admissibility of exemption from service tax to extent R & D Cess - See
                                        under CESS  ..................................... 123
                                     Recovery of Dues - Adjustment of refund - Suo motu adjustment - Natural
                                        justice - Unilateral decision to adjust part of sanctioned refund against
                                        disputed interest liability not only violating natural justice but also falls
                                        short of fairness standards expected of statutory authorities - Existence of
                                        power to  recover dues not meaning that same can  be done suo  motu
                                        without grant of hearing - Accordingly, impugned order set aside -
                                        Matter remanded  to authorities for  consideration afresh after hearing
                                        petitioner and decide issue  within eight  weeks - Section 79 of Central
                                        Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Article 226 of Constitution of India —
                                        DPK Engineers Private Limited v. Union of India (Kar.) ...................  18
                                     REFUND/REFUND CLAIM :
                                     — adjustment for recovery of dues, suo motu adjustment violating natural
                                        justice - See under RECOVERY  ..........................  18
                                     — Cenvat credit - Services provided to SEZ Unit - Issue no longer res integra
                                        in view of decision of Tribunal in 2016 (46) S.T.R. 751 (Tri.-Del.)  -  Cenvat
                                                           GST LAW TIMES      2nd April 2020      92
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33