Page 104 - GSTL_14th May 2020_Vol 36_Part 2
P. 104

206                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 36
                                                       2020 (36) G.S.T.L. 206 (Guj.)

                                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                                                      J.B. Pardiwala and Bhargav D. Karia, JJ.
                                                            KANAL ENTERPRISE
                                                                      Versus
                                                             STATE OF GUJARAT
                                            R/Special Civil Application No. 17673 of 2019, decided on 11-3-2020
                                            Provisional  attachment - Only  during pendency  of any proceedings
                                     under Section 62, 63, 64, 67, 73 or 74 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act,
                                     2017 - Attachment cannot be made during proceedings under Section 71 ibid -
                                     In fact, no proceedings  could be instituted under Section  71  ibid as it  talks
                                     about access to business premises - Order of attachment under Section 83 ibid
                                     to be quashed. - There is no power vested in the authorities to invoke the provisions of
                                     Section 83 ibid during the pendency of the proceedings instituted under Section 71(1) of
                                     Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. [paras 5, 6, 7]
                                                                                             Petition allowed
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      S/Shri Apurva N. Mehta and Vijay H. Patel, for the
                                                                  Petitioner.
                                                                  Shri Soaham Joshi, AGP, for the Respondent.
                                            [Order per : J.B. Pardiwala, J. (Oral)]. - By this writ application under
                                     Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a registered partner-
                                     ship firm through one of its partners has prayed for the following reliefs :
                                            “(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to admit and allow this Peti-
                                                 tion.
                                            (B)  YOUR LORDSHIPS may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of Man-
                                                 damus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and thereby
                                                 be pleased to quash and set aside the order of provisional attach-
                                                 ment of the stock of goods valued at Rs. 1,26,00,000 dated 30-7-2019
                                                 passed by the Respondent No. 2.
                                            (C)  YOUR LORDSHIPS may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of Man-
                                                 damus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and thereby
                                                 be pleased to quash and set aside the order of provisional attach-
                                                 ment of the Petitioner’s Current  account bearing  A/c  No.
                                                 655305600366 maintained with ICICI Bank, Nirmala Convent Road
                                                 Branch,  Rajkot dated 30-7-2019 passed by the passed by the Re-
                                                 spondent No. 2.
                                            (D)  YOUR LORDSHIPS may kindly be pleased issue a writ of Manda-
                                                 mus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and thereby be
                                                 pleased to quash and set aside the action of blocking of input tax
                                                 credit of Rs. 24,30,850 vide communication dated 20-7-2019 by the
                                                 Respondent No. 3.
                                            (E)  Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the present Peti-
                                                 tion, Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate
                                                 writ, order or direction and thereby be pleased to stay the operation
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      14th May 2020      104
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109