Page 35 - GSTL_11th June 2020_Vol 37_Part 2
P. 35

2020 ]      GST ON DIRECTOR’S REMUNERATION — A CRITICAL ANALYSIS      J43
               the Tribunals have paid emphasis on the existence of employer and employee
               relationship while deciding the taxability on the director’s remuneration :
                       (a)  NRB Industrial Bearings Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE & ST, Aurangabad - 2019 (8)
                           TMI 600-CESTAT Mumbai
                       (b)  M/s. Brahm Alloy Limited v. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise,
                           Durgapur, 2019 (4) TMI 1537-CESTAT Kolkata
                       (c)  M/s. Maithan Alloys Ltd. v. CCE & ST, Bolpur - 2019 (4) TMI 1595-
                           CESTAT Kolkata
               In the light of the above judicial pronouncements, the presence of the following
               factors would determine the existence of employer and employee relationship.
                       (1)  There is an employment contract entered into between Director and
                           the company clearly defining roles and responsibilities, terms of the
                           appointment, terms of the remuneration, terms of the termination,
                           the person to whom director would report.
                       (2)  The Director is paid a salary on a monthly basis. The component of
                           salary can be in monetary as well in non-monetary, can be fixed as
                           well variable pay.
                       (3)  Supervisory aspect is important, i.e., MD/WTD is accountable for
                           his performance and will be under the supervisory control of anoth-
                           er person i.e. Board of Directors of the Company.
                       (4)  Treatment under Income-tax Act - if treated as Salary, TDS deduc-
                           tion under Section 92 and Form 16 issued and in ITR of Directors,
                           disclosed as Salary Income
                       (5)  Treatment under other laws like Provident Fund, Professional Tax,
                           ESIC, etc. - whether declared as an employee or not.
                       (6)  Necessary Orders, Contracts, Board Resolutions, etc.  to  reiterate
                           Employer-Employee Relationship and salary paid.
               Though the Ruling by AAR is only with regard to the Applicant who had filed the
               application to AAR and not binding on others, the Audit, as and when it happens
               eventually, will always demand the GST on all remuneration paid to directors.
               Suggestion
                       There are Two Options open and they are, -
                       (1)  Pay the GST on such Salaries paid to Directors under RCM in cash
                           and avail the ITC based on payment challens and thus, it is revenue
                           neutral situation; or
                       (2)  Take necessary precautions to  establish employer-employee rela-
                           tionship under Companies Act, Income Tax, Provident Fund Act,
                           ESI Act, etc. and contest the issue and when the same is agitated.
                           The issue may lead to litigation inviting interest and penalty apart
                           from legal costs.

                                                _______



                                     GST LAW TIMES      11th June 2020      35
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40