Page 185 - GSTL_2nd July 2020 _Vol 38_Part 1
P. 185

2020 ]       BHARAT MINES & MINERALS v. COMMR. OF CGST, DEHRADUN     103
                       4.   Support them in negotiation with the buyer to finalize the rate,
                           terms of payment etc.
                       5.   Correspondence with the buyers for Purchase Orders and Letter of
                           Credit etc. and arrange to locate the  Clearing  Agent for shipping
                           and deal with them for all related matters.
                       6.   Arrange to locate the clearing agent for shipping  and deal with
                           them for all related matters.
                       7.   Prepare all  documents required  for buyer, Customs etc. viz.
                           Proforma invoice, Invoice for Customs, Commercial Invoice for ne-
                           gotiation of documents against Letter of Credit, checking for Ship-
                           ping Instruction and Bill of Lading etc.
                       8.   Complete management of Foreign Currency including hedging etc.
                           which is quite technical matter and required expertise to enhance
                           for payment.
                       9.   Any other activities related to and/or ancillary to the export of their
                           product.
                       4.  But, department formed an opinion that the rebate has been claimed
               with respect to such services as  are not truly specified in the Notification No.
               41/2012, specifically, due to  the amendment of this notification vide a subse-
               quent Notification No. 1/2016, dated 3-2-2016. The post export services are held
               to be the services beyond the place of factory. Resultantly, the refund as claimed
               was partially rejected initially by the original adjudicating authority vide the re-
               spective order as mentioned above. The appeal thereof has been rejected on the
               same ground. Still being aggrieved the appellant is before this Tribunal.
                       5.  Learned Counsel for the appellant has laid emphasis upon the affi-
               davit given by their Chartered Accountant, Mr. Anuj Maheshwari deposing spe-
               cifically as follows :
                       That the deponent is providing services other than chartered accountant
                       services specially in the field of  Export which include identification of
                       potential countries and introduction and related correspondence with
                       buyers; getting requisite approvals of the product from buyers including
                       technical tests and supports; Negotiations with buyers to finalize rate,
                       terms of payment collecting purchase order, letter of credits, identifying
                       and  locating clearing agents,  shipping agents; advice  and assistance  in
                       preparation of documentation for export, complete management of for-
                       eign currency including hedging to enhance payment in terms of rupee
                       and any assistance in export related activities and accordingly discharg-
                       ing  service  tax on  such service  and filing proper return in form
                       ST-3.
                       6.  It is submitted that irrespective of the amendment in February, 2016
               in the definition of specified  services given in Notification No. 41/2012, the
               above mentioned services are the specified services as per the said notification
               for which the appellant is entitled to the refund of the Service Tax paid on the
               said services. Order-under-challenge is already prayed to be set aside.
                       7.  Per contra Learned DR while justifying the impugned order has im-
               pressed upon the para 5 thereof. It is submitted that in terms of the definition of
               specified service in the impugned notification, the Commissioner (Appeals) has
               correctly formed the opinion that since the impugned services were not used for

                                     GST LAW TIMES      2nd July 2020      185
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190