Page 209 - GSTL_2nd July 2020 _Vol 38_Part 1
P. 209

2020 ]  IN RE : OMSAI PROFESSIONAL DETECTIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES PVT. LTD. 127
                            has raised the demand based on the actual turnovers instead of es-
                            timated turnover. The same Ld.  Adjudicating authority  has raised
                            the demand based on the turnover declared in the GSTR-01 for the
                            month of September, 2018 to December, 2018 while the same analo-
                            gy was not being followed the other months. Enclosing herewith a
                            table  comparing the turnovers as  considered in the GSTR-01, and
                            considered in the assessment proceedings for your kind perusal. Al-
                            so enclosing a table showing differential demand.

                             Month       As per GSTR-01          As per assessment order
                                  IGST  CGST   SGST  TOTAL TAX   IGST  CGST  SGST  SUB-
                                                                              TOTAL
                            Dec.’ 17  21,91,138  80,40,123  80,40,123  1,82,71,384  -  2,16,52,918  2,16,52,918  4,33,05,836
                            Jan.’ 18  21,86,181  95,95,133  95,95,133  2,13,76,447  -  2,16,52,918  2,16,52,918  4,33,05,836
                            Feb.’ 18  19,14,800  64,94,710  64,94,710  1,49,04,219  20,58,944   68,89,543  68,89,543  1,58,38,030
                            Mar.’ 18  24,88,737  87,32,654  87,32,654  1,99,54,045  -  2,16,52,918  2,16,52,918  4,33,05,836
                            Apr.’ 18  14,69,985  59,32,897  59,32,897  1,33,35,779  -  2,16,52,918  2,16,52,918  4,33,05,836
                            May.’ 18  22,78,322  85,86,075  85,86,075  1,94,50,473  -  2,16,52,918  2,16,52,918  4,33,05,836
                            Jun.’  18  18,08,654  79,75,785  79,75,785  1,77,60,223  -  2,16,52,918  2,16,52,918  4,33,05,836
                             Jul.’ 18  16,19,925  60,89,062  60,89,062  1,37,98,049  -  2,16,52,918  2,16,52,918  4,33,05,836
                            Aug.’ 18  12,10,214  81,46,316  81,46,316  1,75,02,846  -  2,16,52,918  2,16,52,918  4,33,05,836
                             Total   1,71,67,956 6,95,92,755 6,95,92,755  15,63,53,466 20,58,944  18,01,12,887  18,01,12,887  36,22,84,718

                            Table showing differential demand : (Figures in ‘()’ indicate excess
                            demanded by the assessment order)

                              Month                 Differential Amount
                                       IGST       CGST       SGST      SUB-TOTAL
                             Dec.’ 17   21,91,139   (1,36,12,794)   (1,36,12,794)   (2,50,34,449)
                             Jan.’ 18   21,86,181   (1,20,57,786)   (1,20,57,786)   (2,19,29,391)
                             Feb.’ 18   (1,44,144)   (3,94,834)   (3,94,834)   (9,33,812)
                             Mar.’ 18   24,88,737   (1,29,20,264)   (1,29,20,264)   (2,33,51,791)
                             Apr.’ 18   14,69,985   (1,57,20,021)   (1,57,20,021)   (2,99,70,057)
                             May’ 18   22,78,322   (1,30,66,843)   (1,30,66,843)   (2,38,55,363)
                             Jun.’ 18   18,08,654   (1,36,77,133)   (1,36,77,133)   (2,55,45,613)
                              Jul.’ 18   16,19,925   (1,55,63,856)   (1,55,63,856)   (2,95,07,787)
                             Aug.’ 18   12,10,214   (1,35,06,602)   (1,35,06,602)   (2,58,02,990)
                              Total  1,53,97,301  (11,05,20,133)  (11,05,20,133)  (24,54,37,567)

                            Therefore, the  demand (if any) may be restricted, on the  turnover
                            declared in GSTR-1 and not beyond that.
                            In Re : The Penalty under Section 122 is not imposable :
                       (15)   Appellant submits the penalty is not imposable as there is no offense
                            committed that attracts penal action under Section 122, CGST Act,
                            2017. The fact that appellant has been filing the returns in Form
                            GSTR-1 returns regularly and also remitting the tax dues wherever
                            possible, despite the huge cash crunch of its the business.
               Discussion :
                       12.  Perused the grounds of  appeal vis-à-vis the impugned orders
               passed by the assessing authority i.e. AA.
                                     GST LAW TIMES      2nd July 2020      209
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214