Page 204 - GSTL_2nd July 2020 _Vol 38_Part 1
P. 204

122                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 38
                                     marks, he is left with no other option, but to resorte to pass the best judgment
                                     assessment orders under Section 62 of CGST/SGST Act, 2017. The A.A has esti-
                                     mated the appellant’s outward taxable supplies, by enhancing the returned out-
                                     ward taxable supplies in the returns in Form GSTR-1 by 50% towards probable
                                     supplies. Thus, the AA has best judged the turnovers of the appellant @ 150% of
                                     the returned outward supplies and levied tax there on @ 18%. The AA also in-
                                     voked Section 50 and computed the interest liability of the appellant.
                                            7.  Besides, the AA also levied penalty @ 100% under Section 122 hold-
                                     ing that the appellant has wilfully suppressed such 150% of the returned turno-
                                     vers in Form GSTR-1, in such default. The details of such total tax, interest and
                                     penalty levied are given below in the table.

                                       Month      SGST     SGST     CGST      CGST     IGST   IGST    Penalty
                                                           Interest          Interest         Interest   100%
                                     Dec.’ 17   2,16,52,918  30,09,756  2,16,52,918  30,09,756  -    4,33,05,836
                                     Jan.’ 18   2,16,52,918  26,74,135  2,16,52,918  26,74,135  -    4,33,05,836
                                     Feb.’ 18    68,89,543  7,54,405  68,89,543  7,54,405  20,58,944  2,25,454  1,58,38,030
                                     Mar.’ 18   2,16,52,918  20,35,374  2,16,52,918  20,35,374       4,33,05,836
                                     Apr.’ 18   2,16,52,918  17,10,580  2,16,52,918  17,10,580       4,33,05,836
                                     May’ 18    2,16,52,918  13,74,960  2,16,52,918  13,74,960       4,33,05,836
                                     Jun.’ 18   2,16,52,918  10,50,167  2,16,52,918  10,50,167       4,33,05,836
                                     Jul.’ 18   2,16,52,918  7,14,546  2,16,52,918  7,14,546         4,33,05,836
                                     Aug.’ 18   2,16,52,918  3,78,926  2,16,52,918  3,78,926         4,33,05,836
                                     Total Amt.   18,01,12,887  1,37,02,849  18,01,12,887  1,37,02,849  20,58,944 2,25,454  36,22,84,718

                                            8.  Thus, the AA has levied the tax,  penalty and interest as detailed
                                     hereunder :

                                                          Tax         Rs.  36,22,84,718/-
                                                          Penalty     Rs. 36,22,84,718/-
                                                          Interest    Rs.  2,76,31,152/-
                                                          Total       Rs. 75,22,00,588/-

                                            9.  Aggrieved by the above orders passed by the assessing authority, the
                                     appellant has preferred the present  appeal and  disputed the levy of tax of
                                     Rs. 75,22,00,588/-.
                                     Grounds of Appeal :
                                            10.  The grounds of appeal filed by appellant in the appeal are extracted
                                     hereunder;
                                            (1)   Appellant submits that the impugned order is ex facie illegal and un-
                                                  tenable in law since the same is contrary to facts and judicial deci-
                                                  sions.
                                            (2)   As stated in the background facts, and as an elaboration to the same,
                                                  the appellant would like to explain the practical difficulty faced at
                                                  the time of committing default of non-filing of return, which had oc-
                                                  curred purely as a result of helplessness and was undoubtedly
                                                  without any malicious intention of evading taxes.
                                            (3)   Appellant submits that the main reason for delayed/Non-payment
                                                  of GST is due to huge delay in the realisation of the amounts due
                                                           GST LAW TIMES      2nd July 2020      204
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209