Page 182 - GSTL_16th July 2020_Vol. 38_Part 3
P. 182

420                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 38
                                                  (a)  The final output or basis of consideration of quantum of min-
                                                      eral extracted, whereas supply of machinery is not done with
                                                      M/s. AMP but to he himself (as discussed supra point 5);
                                                  (b)  Works Contract Services (hereinafter WCS) as defined in Sec-
                                                      tion 2(119) of CGST Act, 2017 is “a contract for building, con-
                                                      struction, fabrication, completion, erection, installation, fitting out,
                                                      improvement, modification, repair, maintenance, renovation, altera-
                                                      tion or commissioning of any immovable property wherein transfer
                                                      of property in goods (whether as goods or in same other farm) is in-
                                                      volved in  the  execution of such contract”. Thus, the  foremost
                                                      conditions of WCS are that it leads to creation of an immova-
                                                      ble property and then transfer of the said property in goods,
                                                      whereas in the instant case, no immovable property is created
                                                      and question of transfer does not arise as ownership of the
                                                      property and minerals is with M/s. AMP.
                                            (9)  Further, the contention raised by the applicant that his issue is simi-
                                                 lar to matter discussed in advance ruling order  passed by Jhar-
                                                 khand  Authority for Advance  Ruling (JAAR) vide Order  No.
                                                 JHR/AAR/2018-19/01, dated 2-8-2018 is  also not  tenable on the
                                                 ground that the order passed by JAAR is related to a partnership
                                                 firm which  is engaged  in providing  works contract services to a
                                                 government entity whereas in the instant case, both facts are non-
                                                 existing.
                                            (10)  Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017 delineates clauses under which an
                                                 applicant can sought advance ruling, which are as following -
                                                  (2)  The question on which the advance ruling is sought under this
                                                  Act, shall be in respect of, -
                                                  (a)  classification of any goods or services or both;
                                                  (b)  applicability of a notification issued under  the provisions of
                                                      this Act,
                                                  (c)   determination of time and value of supply of goods or services
                                                      both;
                                                  (d)  admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have
                                                      been paid;
                                                  (e)   determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or ser-
                                                      vices or both;
                                                  (f)   whether applicant is required to be registered;
                                                  (g)  whether any particular thing done by the  applicant with re-
                                                      spect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in
                                                      a supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of
                                                      that term.
                                                 We find that the issue raised by the applicant in question 2 and 3 are
                                                 beyond the scope of this authority as it is not covered under Section
                                                 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.
                                            F.  In view of the foregoing, we rule as follows :-
                                                           GST LAW TIMES      16th July 2020      182
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187