Page 119 - GSTL_27th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 4
P. 119

2020 ]                   IN RE : VIVEK V. RATNAPARKHI                445
                       5.6  In view of the above, we hold that the subject product has been
               rightly classified by the applicant  under Chapter  Heading  23.09 and the said
               product, falling under TSH 2309 90 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as adopted to
               GST, attracts ’NIL’ rate as per Sr. No. 102 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax
               (Rate), dated 28-6-2017.
                       5.7  The second question raised by the applicant is “whether the goods
               falling under TSH 2309 90 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as adopted to GST can
               be treated as ‘waste of sugar manufacture, whether or not in the form of pellets under
               Heading 2303’ attracting 5% GST per Schedule I, Sr. No. 104 of Notification No.
               1/2017-C.T. (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 or not.
                       5.7.1  The jurisdictional officer has contended that goods falling under
               TSH 2309 90 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as adopted by GST cannot be treated
               as ‘waste of sugar manufacture in the form of pellets under Heading 2303 attract-
               ing 5% GST under Sr. No. 104 of Notification No. 1/2017-C.T. (Rate), dated 28-6-
               2017 and has made arguments and submissions accordingly.
                       5.7.2  We find that the subject question Number 2 is general in nature
               and does not appear to be connected to a particular product being manufactured
               by the applicant or proposed to be manufactured. Thus the said question is not
               relating to supply of goods or services or both, being undertaken or proposed to
               be undertaken by the applicant. Also, the said question is not on matters or ques-
               tions specified in sub-section (2) of Section 97, in relation to the supply of goods
               or services or both being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the appli-
               cant. Hence we refrain from answering the second question.
                       6.  In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass
               an order as follows :
                                                ORDER
                       7.  For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the questions are
               answered thus -
                       Question A :-  Whether the classification of ‘Shatamrut Chyavan’ falling
                                    under TSH 2309 90 10 of Customs Tariff  Act, 1975  as
                                    adopted to  GST attracting ‘NIL’ rate  (0%) of IGST (0%)
                                    CGST + (0%) SGST as per List of Exempted Goods as per
                                    Sr. No. 102 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate),
                                    dated 28-6-2017 is correct or not?
                       Answer :-    Answered in the affirmative.
                       Question B :-  Whether the goods falling under TSH 2309 90 10 of Cus-
                                    toms Tariff Act, 1975 as adopted to GST can be treated as
                                    ‘waste of sugar manufacture, whether or not in the form of pel-
                                    lets under Heading 2303’ attracting 5% of IGST (2.5% CGST
                                    + 2.5% SGST) as per Schedule I (Sr. No. 104) of Notifica-
                                    tion No.  1/2017-Central  Tax (Rate), dated  28-6-2017 or
                                    not?
                       Answer :-    Not answered, in view of discussions made above.

                                                _______

                                    GST LAW TIMES      27th August 2020      119
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124