Page 46 - ELT_1st June 2020_VOL 372_Part 5th
P. 46

A170                        EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372

                                                 “Statutes are in pari materia which relate to the same person or thing,
                                            or to the same class of persons or things. The word par must not be con-
                                            founded with the word simlis. It is used in opposition to it - intimating not
                                            likeness merely but identity. It is a phrase applicable to public statutes or
                                            general laws made at different times and in reference to the same subject.”
                                     From the perusal of above explication, it becomes clear that Sections 124 and 125
                                     of the Customs Act, 1962 are in pari materia to Section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017
                                     as they refer to same class of persons, i.e. persons whose goods is/are liable to be
                                     confiscated (under Customs Act, 1962 or under CGST Act, 2017, as the case may
                                     be).
                                            Therefore, all judicial precedents made in the context of Sections 124 and
                                     125 of the Customs  Act,  1962, shall naturally  be applicable  to cases stemming
                                     from Section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017. This point further gets reinforced by the
                                     following observation made by Lord Mansfield in the case of R v. Loxdale, (1758)
                                     1 Burr. 445, wherein he observed :
                                            “Where there are different statutes in pari material though made at different
                                            times, or even expired and not referring to each other, they shall be taken and
                                            construed together, as one system, and as explanatory of each other”
                                     Redemption Fine and Show Cause Notice
                                            As has already been discussed, the option of ‘Redemption Fine’ is given
                                     to the owner of the goods only after ascertainment by the proper officer of the
                                     Department of the fact that goods are liable for confiscation. It may be pointed
                                     out that order of confiscation can be passed only when the goods proposed to be
                                     confiscated are found to be ‘liable to confiscation’ under Sections 111, 113, 118,
                                     119 and120 of the Customs Act, 1962, or under Section 130(1) of the CGST Act,
                                     2017.
                                            Here, it must be borne in mind that before confiscating such goods or
                                     passing any order for confiscation of such goods, concerned Proper Officer has to
                                     fulfil certain obligations as stipulated in Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962,
                                     and Section 130(4) of the CGST Act, 2017.
                                            For the sake of convenience, Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962, and
                                     Section 130(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, have been reproduced below :

                                     Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962
                                            “SECTION 124. Issue of show cause notice before confiscation of goods,
                                            etc. - No order confiscating any goods or imposing any penalty on any person
                                            shall be made under this Chapter  unless the owner of the goods or such
                                            person -
                                            (a) is given a notice in writing with the prior approval of the officer of Cus-
                                            toms not below the rank of an Assistant Commissioner of Customs, inform-
                                            ing him of the grounds on which it is proposed to confiscate the goods or to
                                            impose a penalty;
                                            (b)  is given an opportunity of making a representation in writing within such
                                            reasonable time as may be specified in the notice against the grounds of con-
                                            fiscation or imposition of penalty mentioned therein; and
                                            (c)  is given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in the matter :
                                            Provided that the notice referred to in clause (a) and the representation re-
                                            ferred to in clause (b) may, at the request of the person concerned be oral.”
                                                                     [Emphasis supplied]
                                                          EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st June 2020      46
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51