Page 130 - GSTL_ 28th May 2020_Vol 36_Part 4
P. 130

576                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 36
                                     the requirement of fruit juice content  in the Beverages to be termed as either
                                     ‘Carbonated  Fruit Beverages or Fruit  Drinks’ or ‘Carbonated  Beverages with
                                     Fruit Juice’, while the food category under ‘Appendix A’ provides the categorisa-
                                     tion of water-based flavoured  drinks based on ‘Carbonated’ or ‘Non-
                                     Carbonated’. In the case at hand, it is an admitted fact that the Carbonated water
                                     content in the impugned  products  is  around  92.5% and the content of lime
                                     juice/lime juice concentrate is 2.5% & Orange juice is 5% and the Beverages are
                                     ready to drink beverages supplied in  sealed bottles of various  capacities  after
                                     being carbonated. The same is marketed as ‘Carbonated Beverage with Fruit
                                     Juice’. Thus,  the products have the fruit content required under [Para]  3A of
                                     Regulation 2.3.30 and also satisfies the categorisation under 14.1.4.1. Therefore,
                                     the products purported to be prepared from fruit juice, the content of which is
                                     2.5%/5% in respect  of lime/other  fruit  juices and carbonated water, sugar etc.
                                     are ‘Carbonated Beverages with  Fruit  Juice’ of Para  2.3.30  and  food category
                                     14.1.4.1 of Appendix A of the Regulation. We also note that the appellant, while
                                     have stated that the products do not fall under the food category of 14.1.4.1, has
                                     not come forth with the applicable categorisation. We hold that there is no con-
                                     tradiction in  the findings  of the Lower  authority, in the categorisation of the
                                     product under FSSAI.
                                            8.4  The appellant has stated that the products which are not essentially
                                     in the nature of waters, would not fall for classification under 2202 10 20/2202 10
                                     90 and that the said view is affirmed by the Hon’ble Tribunal Larger Bench in the
                                     case of Brindavan Beverages Pvt. Ltd. [2019 (10) TMI 762 = 2019 (29) G.S.T.L. 418
                                     (Tri. - LB)]. In the cited decision under Para 66, it is observed as under :
                                            “66.  It can however be urged that even when lemon or lime juice is added
                                            to water as a  flavouring agent, the  product can  still be called lemonade.
                                            Though it has to be seen whether the product is  essentially waters with
                                            added flavour or whether lemon juice is the basis of the fruit drink, but the
                                            answer also  lies  in the definition  of “non-carbonated ready to serve fruit
                                            beverages” under Regulation 2.3.10 and “Carbonated fruit beverages and
                                            fruit drinks” under regulation 2.3.30.  It would follow  from these regulations
                                            that even when lime juice is added but the fruit content of lime or lemon juice is not
                                            less than 5%, the product would be classified as fruit juice based drinks but if the
                                            lime or lemon juice content is less than 5%, then it would classify as lemonade.”
                                                                       (emphasis supplied)
                                     The Tribunal has concluded that those carbonated beverages wherein the content
                                     of lime or lemon juice is less than 5% would classify as lemonade. In the case at
                                     hand the content of lime juice/orange juice is 2.5%/5.0% only and therefore the
                                     cited decision is not applicable to the case at hand.
                                            9.  The appellant has placed reliance on the decision of the Ld. Commis-
                                     sioner (Appeals), Hyderabad in the case Trinity Beverages Pvt. Ltd. [42/19-20, dat-
                                     ed 30-9-2019] and have claimed that their competitors in the Industry who are
                                     manufacturing similar carbonated beverages are classifying their products under
                                     CTH 2202 99 20 as fruit juice based drinks. It is seen that in the said case, the
                                     Fruit juice content in the  Beverages  is  around 7% and the Commissioner  (Ap-
                                     peals) following the CESTAT Larger Bench decision in the case of Brindavan Bev-
                                     erages cited above has held that they are fruit-based and accordingly classified
                                     under CTH 2202 99 20. The facts are not similar inasmuch as the percentage of
                                     fruit content in the products at hand are 5% or less and as per the cited Larger
                                     Bench decision, the same are not fruit juice based drinks.
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      28th May 2020      130
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135